Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455546›Full record

ArticleBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries2020

The epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes following intentional burn injury at a regional burn center.

Kenisha Atwell, Colleen Bartley, Bruce Cairns, Anthony Charles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Characterising fire or burn-related fatalities in the USA using the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003-2020.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment Decisions in Patients With Potentially Nonsurvivable Burn Injury in Australia and New Zealand: A Registry-Based Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenisha AtwellDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, United States.
Colleen BartleyDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, United States.
Bruce CairnsDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, United States.
Anthony CharlesDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, United States. Electronic address: anthchar@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

TRAUMA RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPT32GM008450 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Bruce A Cairns, Anthony G Charles · 1992 to 2026
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntentional burn injury outcomes are usually more severe, have a high mortality and are seen more often in low and middle-income countries. This study will examine the epidemiological characteristics of intentional burn injury patients and mortality outcomes at a regional Burn Center.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of 11,977 patients admitted to a regional Burn center from 2002 to 2015.Variables analyzed were basic demographics (sex, age, and race), total body surface area of burn (%TBSA), presence of inhalation injury, Charlson comorbidity index, intent of injury, mortality, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Chi-square tests, bivariate analysis and logistic regression models were utilized to determine the effect of burn intent on outcomes.

resultsEleven thousand eight hundred and twenty-three (n = 11,823) adult and pediatric patients from 2002 to 2015 were included in the study. Three hundred and forty-eight (n = 348, 2.9%) patients had intentional burn injuries (IBI). Patients with IBI were younger, 26.5 ± 20 years compared to the non-intentional burn injury (NIBI) group (32 ± 22 years, p < 0.001). Mean %TBSA was significantly higher in the IBI vs. NIBI group at 14.6 ± 20 vs. 6.4 ± 10%, p < 0.001, respectively. Overall, Non-whites (n = 230, 66%) were more likely to have IBI, p < 0.001. Inhalation injury and mortality were statistically significant in the IBI group compared to the NIBI group, (n = 54,16%) vs. (n = 30, 9%) and (n = 649,6%) vs. (n = 329,2.9%), p < 0.001, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression did not show any significant increase in odds of mortality based on burn intent. In subgroup analysis of self-inflicted (SIB) vs. assault burns, SIB patients were significantly older, 38 years (±14.7) vs. 22.4 years (±20.5), p < 0.001 and had a higher %TBSA, 26.5 (±29.6) vs. 10.3 (±13.6), p < 0.001. Seventy three percent (n = 187, 73%) of assault burn patients were Nonwhite and Whites were more likely to incur self-inflicted burns, (n = 53% p < 0.001).

conclusionWe show that patients with intentional burn injuries have an associated increased %TBSA and inhalation injury without increased adjusted odds for mortality. Intentional burns increase health care expenditures. Violence prevention initiatives and access to mental health providers may be beneficial in reducing intentional burn injury burden.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge DistributionBody Surface AreaBurnsBurn UnitsChildChild AbuseChild, PreschoolFemaleFiresetting BehaviorHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleAssault-related burn injuryIntentional burn injurySelf-inflicted burn

Identifiers

PMID31455546
PMCPMC7036333
OpenAlexW2969424510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.