ArticleComparative medicine2019
Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analgesic drug efficacy in mouse postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lab animal · 2026Pooled it
- A model to simulate cardio-respiratory responses to fentanyl analgesia after traumatic injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Acetaminophen, a new tool for the refinement of the experimental infection of toxoplasmosis in mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Burrowing Behavior as Robust Parameter for Early Humane Endpoint Determination in Murine Models for Pancreatic Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Reporting practices of anesthetic and analgesic use in rodent orthopedic research.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fully automated deep learning models with smartphone applicability for prediction of pain using the Feline Grimace Scale.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Long-Acting Opioid Analgesics for Acute Pain: Pharmacokinetic Evidence Reviewed.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Making a case for the free exploratory paradigm: animal welfare-friendly assays that enhance heterozygosity and ecological validity.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Ultrasound Guided Surgery as a Refinement Tool in Oncology Research.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Pharmacokinetics of Sustained-release and Extended-release Buprenorphine in Mice after Surgical Catheterization.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022Article
- Current ecotoxicity testing needs among selected U.S. federal agencies.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2022Review
- Reducing Pain in Experimental Models of Intestinal Inflammation Affects the Immune Response.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2022Review
- Mouse Models of Osteoarthritis: A Summary of Models and Outcomes Assessment.Comparative medicine · 2022Review
- Open Transparent Communication about Animals in Laboratories: Dialog for Multiple Voices and Multiple Audiences.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Estimating mouse and rat use in American laboratories by extrapolation from Animal Welfare Act-regulated species.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Analysis of Animal Well-Being When Supplementing Drinking Water with Tramadol or Metamizole during Chronic Pancreatitis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientists have ethical and regulatory commitments to minimize pain and distress during their use of sentient laboratory animals. Here I discuss pain as a special form of distress and the long history of ethical and regulatory standards calling on scientists to prevent, minimize, treat or terminate animal pain. Scientists, veterinarians, and IACUC face 2 challenges: knowledge of effective analgesic doses and regimens for all sexes, ages and genotypes of rodent is incomplete, and concerns regarding the effects of analgesic drugs on research outcomes push scientists to request approval to withhold analgesics and leave animal pain unalleviated. IACUC thus conduct what I call an 'ethics of uncertainty,' in which they factor in the limits of available ethically relevant information on the amount of expected animal suffering, the usefulness of analgesics to mitigate this suffering, and the eventual benefits that come from the research. IACUC must factor in current limitations in severity assessments of various experimental manipulations in various strains, inaccurate pain diagnosis, in known effective analgesic and other refinements, and on effects of pain medications and untreated pain on data outcomes, when deciding to allow potentially painful experiments and animal care practices. This article focuses on 3 areas of concern: the limits of veterinary "professional judgment" when the animal model's degree of pain and the efficacy of pain medications are not yet known; the review of proposals with known, unalleviated significant pain and distress (that is, Category E experiments); and the attempt to review the balance between animal welfare harms and scientific objectives. I propose no new regulations, standards, or ethical norms herein but rather explore some of the implications when existing ethical principles are applied to evolving scientific knowledge (and vice versa). I conclude that applying current animal pain management knowledge to prevailing ethical principles will shift IACUC toward greater caution in allowing potentially painful animal experiments, with heightened caution regarding the ability of analgesics to mitigate the animals' pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.