ArticlePrimary health care research & development2019
Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the perception-practice gap: a mixed-methods study on interprofessional collaboration for diabetes and periodontitis management.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- The Role of Gaze in Shaping Forms of Reflective Practice: A Legitimation Code Theory Analysis of Clinical Supervision in Danish Primary Care.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Core values and best practice criteria for interprofessional teams in primary care: a qualitative interview study with general practitioners and other health professionals from Bavaria, Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Concept Analysis.Journal of caring sciences · 2025Review
- From leader to peer - specializing physicians' understanding of their multiple positions in interprofessional health care teams.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Understanding the experience of clinicians and non-clinical staff in Integrated Virtual Care, a hybrid primary care program in rural Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Teamwork in Rural Emergency Health Care: A Simulation-Based Cross-over Study of Co-located and Distributed Teams.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2025Article
- Insights into the profile, professional setting, and needs of in-home physiotherapists in Switzerland: a national online survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Article
- Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- Identify and classify interprofessional primary care performance indicators: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The Contribution of Intersectoral Healthcare Centres with an Extended Outpatient Care Model to Improve Regional Care-Structures-A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Examining utility and feasibility of implementing patient-reported outcome measures in occupational therapy primary care practice.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2022Article
- Dementia-related continuing education for rural interprofessional primary health care in Saskatchewan, Canada: perceptions and needs of webinar participants.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- Collaboration amongst general practitioners and gynaecologists working in primary health care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Primary health care research & development · 2021Article
- Organizational attributes of interprofessional primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in ontario, Canada: a multiple case study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Effectiveness.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Article
- Interprofessional Primary Care and Acute Care Hospital Use by People With Dementia: A Population-Based Study.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers.
backgroundDespite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models.
methodsA qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question.
findingsA total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.