ArticleBMC health services research2019
Understanding patients' satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a Quality Care Climate Perspective: A Systematic Review of Associations Among Patient Experience, Patient Outcomes, and Organisational Climate Factors in Hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of Medical Associate Professions (MAPs) on the productivity, quality of care, patient and healthcare workforce satisfaction, and budget implications in various healthcare settings: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Physician associates and anaesthetic associates in UK: rapid systematic review of recent UK based research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Public perception of the physician associate profession in the UK: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Patient Understanding of Health Care Practitioner Titles-A California Survey.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2026Article
- "They just don't have the "doctor" in front of their name:" Dimensions of trust of physician assistants.Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare · 2025Article
- Predictive modelling of the UK physician associate supply: 2014-2038.Future healthcare journal · 2024Article
- Doctors', Patients' and Physician Associates' Perceptions of the Physician Associate Role in the Emergency Department.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Determinants of physical activity promotion in primary care from the patient perspective of people at risk of or living with chronic disease: a COM-B analysis.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Modelling the economic constraints and consequences of anaesthesia associate expansion in the UK National Health Service: a narrative review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Review
- The contribution of physician associates or assistants to the emergency department: A systematic scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023Article
- Patient care, integration and collaboration of physician associates in multiprofessional teams: A mixed methods study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- PAs are Trusted Partners in Clinical Care.North Carolina medical journal · 2023Article
- The role of the physician associate: an overview.Irish journal of medical science · 2022Review
- Evaluation of Physician Assistants' Self-Reported Attitudes and Behaviors After Completion of a Hospital-Wide Multidisciplinary Communication Skills Training Workshop.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Physician associates advance patient safety.Future healthcare journal · 2021Article
- Validation and Adjustment of the Patient Experience Questionnaire (PEQ): A Regional Hospital Study in Norway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Introducing physician associates to hospital patients: Development and feasibility testing of a patient experience-based intervention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysician assistants/associates (PAs) are a recent innovation in acute hospital teams in England and many other countries worldwide. Although existing evidence indicates generally high levels of patient satisfaction with their PA hospital encounters, little is known about the factors associated with this outcome. There is a lack of evidence on the process of PA-patient communication in hospital encounters and how this might influence satisfaction. This study therefore aimed to understand patients' satisfaction with PA acute hospital encounters through PA-patient communication experiences.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted among patients and representatives of patients seen by or receiving care from one of the PAs working in acute hospital services in England. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken face-to-face with study participants in the hospital setting and shortly after their PA encounter. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. The study was framed within a theoretical model of core functions of medical encounter communication.
resultsFifteen patients and patient representatives who had experienced a PA encounter participated in interviews, across five hospitals in England. Four interrelated communication experiences were important to participants who were satisfied with the encounter in general: feeling trust and confidence in the relationship, sharing relevant and meaningful information, experiencing emotional care and support, and sharing discussion on illness management and treatment. However, many participants misconceived PAs to be doctors, raising a potential risk of reduced trust in the PA relationship and negative implications for satisfaction with their PA encounter. Participants considered it beneficial that patients be informed about the PA role to prevent confusion.
conclusionsPA encounters offer a constructive example of successful clinician-patient communication experiences in acute hospital encounters from the patient's perspective. Study participants were generally naïve to the PA role. Hospital services and organisations introducing these mid-level or advanced care practitioner roles should consider giving attention to informing patients about the roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.