Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455306›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Why did I stop? And why did I restart? Perspectives of women lost to follow-up in option B+ HIV care in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Adellah Sariah, Joan Rugemalila, Joyce Protas, Eric Aris, Helen Siril, Edith Tarimo, David Urassa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adellah SariahDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Hubert Kairuki Memorial University (HKMU), 70 Chwaku Street-Mikocheni, P.O. Box 65300, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. adellahsariah@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5786-880X
Joan RugemalilaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, P.O. Box 65000, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Joyce ProtasDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Hubert Kairuki Memorial University (HKMU), 70 Chwaku Street-Mikocheni, P.O. Box 65300, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Eric ArisClinical Department, Management and Development for Health (MDH), P.O. Box 79810, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Helen SirilDepartment of Public Health Evaluation, Management and Development for Health (MDH), P.O. Box 79810, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Edith TarimoDepartment of Nursing Management, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), P.O. Box 65004, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
David UrassaDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS), P.O. Box 65015, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Grace C. John-Stewart · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Afya Bora Consortium U91HA06801BNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite an increased uptake of option B+ treatment among HIV- positive pregnant and breastfeeding women, retaining these women in care is still a major challenge. Previous studies have identified factors associated with loss to follow-up (LTFU) in HIV care, however, the perspectives from HIV-positive pregnant and breastfeeding women regarding their LTFU in option B+ needs further exploration. We explored reasons for LTFU and motivation to resume treatment among HIV-positive women initiated in option B+ in an Urban setting.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted at three public care and treatment clinics (CTC) (Buguruni health center, Sinza hospital, and Mbagala Rangitatu health center) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania between February and May 2017. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 HIV-positive pregnant and breastfeeding women who were lost to follow up in the option B+ regimen. Analysis of data followed content analysis that was performed using NVivo 10 computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software.

resultsEleven women were lost to follow-up and did not resume Option B+, while 19 had resumed treatment. The study indicated a struggle with long term disease amongst HIV-positive pregnant and breastfeeding women initiated in option B+ treatment. The reported reasons contributing to LTFU among these women appeared in three categories. The contribution of LTFU in the first category namely health-related factors included medication side effects and lack of disease symptoms. The second category highlighted the contribution of psychological factors such as loss of hope, fear of medication side effects and HIV-related stigma. The third category underscored the influence of socio-economic statuses such as financial constraints, lack of partner support, family conflicts, non-disclosure of HIV-positive status, and religious beliefs. Motivators to resume treatment after LTFU included support from health care providers and family members, a desire to protect the unborn child from HIV-infection and a need to maintain a healthy status.

conclusionThe study has highlighted the reasons for LTFU and motivation to resume treatment among women initiated in Option B+. Our results provide further evidence on the need for future interventions to focus on these factors in order to improve retention in life-long treatment.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpAdultBreast FeedingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMotivationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaYoung AdultBreastfeedingHIV-positive womenLoss to follow upOption B +PregnantReasonsTanzania

Identifiers

PMID31455306
PMCPMC6712622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.