Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455275›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Post-disaster mental health and psychosocial support in the areas affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake: a qualitative study.

Moe Seto, Harumi Nemoto, Natsuko Kobayashi, Saya Kikuchi, Nami Honda, Yoshiharu Kim, Ilan Kelman, Hiroaki Tomita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A latent profile analysis of the COVID-19 Stressors Scale.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Strategies for Delivering Mental Health Services in Response to Global Climate Change: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Moe SetoDepartment of Disaster Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Harumi NemotoDepartment of Disaster Psychiatry, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8573, Japan.
Natsuko KobayashiDepartment of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Saya KikuchiDepartment of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Nami HondaDepartment of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiharu KimDepartment of Adult Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.
Ilan KelmanInstitute for Risk and Disaster Reduction and Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Hiroaki TomitaDepartment of Disaster Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. htomita@med.tohoku.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies exploring the actual practices implemented for long-term mental health and psychosocial support after a natural disaster have been published. This study aimed to reveal (1) the types of activities that were actually provided as mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in the long-term phase after the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) and (2) the problems that must be addressed to provide post-disaster MHPSS activities.

methodsAn open-ended questionnaire was sent to organizations in the Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures that were potentially involved in providing MHPSS to communities affected by the GEJE. The organizations were asked to describe their activities and the problems that needed to be addressed to provide these support activities. The collected statements were analysed using content analysis with NVivo11.

resultsThe support activities conducted to provide MHPSS in the long-term phase after the catastrophe were diverse and classified into 7 major categories, namely, (1) one-on-one support for individuals in need of assistance, (2) support for collective activities, (3) support around living conditions and income, (4) increasing public awareness about mental health, (5) human resource development to improve response capabilities for MHPSS, (6) support for MHPSS providers, and (7) facilitating collaborations among the MHPSS activities provided to affected communities. Problems with human resources and funding were the most frequently mentioned concerns among the organizations participating in the survey.

conclusionsThe establishment of systems to collect and share sufficient and relevant knowledge and to coordinate organizations for long-term post-disaster postventions would be desirable.

Indexed as

DisastersEarthquakesQualitative ResearchSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansJapanMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesDisasterLong-term after a disasterMental healthMHPSSPsychosocial support

Identifiers

PMID31455275
PMCPMC6712862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.