Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455264›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Patterns and determinants of essential neonatal care utilization among underprivileged ethnic groups in Midwest Nepal: a mixed method study.

Keshab Sanjel, Sharad Raj Onta, Archana Amatya, Prem Basel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology of neonatal infections in hospitals of Nepal: evidence from a large- scale study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keshab SanjelDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. keshabsanjel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2424-665X
Sharad Raj OntaNepal Public Health Foundation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Archana AmatyaDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prem BaselDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally in 2017 neonatal death accounted for 46% of under-five deaths. Nepal is among the developing countries which has a high number of neonatal deaths. The rates are high among poor socio-economic groups, marginalized, as well as people living in remote areas of Nepal. This paper, thus tries to examine the utilization pattern and maternal, household, and health service factors affecting underprivileged ethnic groups in Midwest Nepal.

methodsA cross-sectional mixed method study was conducted from September 2017 to April 2018 in Bardiya district. Quantitative data were collected from a household survey of women who gave live births within the last 12 months prior to data collection (n = 362). Interviews were also undertaken with 10 purposively selected key informants. Logistic regression model was used to determine the factors associated with essential neonatal care utilization. Thematic analysis was undertaken on the qualitative data.

resultsOverall, neonatal care utilization was 58.6% (53.3-63.7%), with big variations seen in the coverage of selected neonatal care components. Factors such as birth order (2.059, 1.13-3.75), ethnicity (2.28, 1.33-3.91), religion (2.37, 1.03-5.46), perceived quality of maternal and neonatal services (2.66, 1.61-4.39) and awareness on immediate essential newborn cares (2.22, 1.28-3.87) were identified as the determining factors of neonatal care utilization.

conclusionsThe coverage of birth preparedness and complication readiness, adequate breastfeeding, and postnatal care attendance were very low as compared to the national target for each component. The determinants of essential neonatal care existed at maternal, household as well as health facility level and included ethnicity, religion, perceived quality of maternal and neonatal services, birth order and awareness on immediate essential newborn care. Appropriate birth spacing, improving the quality of maternal and neonatal services at health facilities and raising mother's level of awareness about neonatal care practices are recommended.

Indexed as

AdultBirth IntervalsBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFacilities and Services UtilizationFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsNepalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareDeterminants of essential neonatal careMidwest NepalMixed methods study patterns of essential neonatal care

Identifiers

PMID31455264
PMCPMC6712593
OpenAlexW2970703121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.