Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455211›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Contrasting diversity of vaginal lactobacilli among the females of Northeast India.

Sumi Das Purkayastha, Mrinal Kanti Bhattacharya, Himanshu Kishore Prasad, Hrishikesh Upadhyaya, Suparna Das Lala, Kunal Pal, Meenakshi Das, Gauri Dutt Sharma, Maloyjo Joyraj Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. American journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic diversity of genusMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vaginal Dysbiotic Microbiome in Women With No Symptoms of Genital Infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Identification and Sensitivity of Vaginal and ProbioticJournal of laboratory physicians · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sumi Das PurkayasthaKarimganj College, Karimganj, Assam, India.
Mrinal Kanti BhattacharyaKarimganj College, Karimganj, Assam, India. mrinalkxj@yahoo.co.in.
Himanshu Kishore PrasadDepartment of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India. himanshu17@gmail.com.
Hrishikesh UpadhyayaDepartment of Botany, Cotton University, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Suparna Das LalaDepartment of Gynaecology, Hospital of Red Cross Society, Karimganj, Assam, India.
Kunal PalDepartment of Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela, Orissa, India.
Meenakshi DasKarimganj College, Karimganj, Assam, India.
Gauri Dutt SharmaBilaspur University, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Maloyjo Joyraj BhattacharjeeKarimganj College, Karimganj, Assam, India. mjoyraj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5442-0276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactobacilli are gatekeepers of vaginal ecosystem impeding growth of pathogenic microbes and their diversity varies across populations worldwide. The present study investigated diversity of human vaginal microbiota among females of Northeast India, who are distinct in dietary habits, lifestyle, and genomic composition from rest of India.

resultsAltogether, 154 bacterial isolates were obtained from vaginal swab samples of 40 pregnant and 29 non-pregnant females. The samples were sequenced for 16 s rRNA gene and analysed for identification using a dual approach of homology search and maximum likelihood based clustering. Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA gene sequence confirmed the isolates belonging to 31 species. Lactobacilli constituted 37.7% of the bacterial isolates with 10 species and other Lactic Acid Bacteria (39.61%) represented another 10 species, some of which are opportunistic pathogens. The remaining of the communities are mostly dominated by species of Staphylococcus (14.28%) and rarely by Propionibacterium avidum (3.90%), Bacillus subtilis, Escherchia coli, Janthinobacterium lividum, and Kocuria kristinae (each 0.64%). Interestingly Lactobacillus mucosae and Enterococcus faecalis, which are globally uncommon vaginal microbes is found dominant among women of Northeast India. This tentatively reflects adaptability of particular Lactobacillus species, in distinct population, to better compete for receptors and nutrients in vaginal epithelium than other species. Further, intrageneric 16S rRNA gene exchange was observed among Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, and two species of Lactobacillus, and deep intraspecies divergence among L. mucosae, which pinpointed possibility of emergence of new strains with evolved functionality. Lactobacilli percentage decreased from young pregnant to aged non-pregnant women with maximum colonization in trimester II.

conclusionThe study highlighted importance of assessment of vaginal microbiota, Lactobacillus in particular, across different population to gain more insight on female health.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAdolescentAdultBacteriaFemaleHumansIndiaLactobacillusMicrobiotaPhylogenyPregnancyVaginaYoung AdultLactobacillusNon-pregnant and pregnant womenNortheast IndiaVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID31455211
PMCPMC6712660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.