Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31454960›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Biomechanical Study of a Novel, Expandable, Non-Metallic and Radiolucent CF/PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR).

Daniel Adler, Michael Akbar, Anna Spicher, Stephanie-Alice Goerke, Werner Schmoelz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel AdlerSpine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Division of Spinal Cord Injury, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7132-0541
Michael AkbarSpine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Division of Spinal Cord Injury, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200A, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. michael.akbar@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Anna SpicherDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Stephanie-Alice GoerkeDepartment of Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Werner SchmoelzDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-2594
Innsbruck Medical University · ATHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral body replacement is well-established to stabilize vertebral injuries due to trauma or cancer. Spinal implants are mainly manufactured by metallic alloys; which leads to artifacts in radiological diagnostics; as well as in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical data of a novel carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) vertebral body replacement (VBR). Six thoracolumbar specimens were tested in a six degrees of freedom spine tester. In all tested specimens CF/PEEK pedicle screws were used. Two different rods (CF/PEEK versus titanium) with/without cross connectors and two different VBRs (CF/PEEK prototype versus titanium) were tested. In lateral bending and flexion/extension; range of motion (ROM) was significantly reduced in all instrumented states. In axial rotation; the CF/PEEK combination (rods and VBR) resulted in the highest ROM; whereas titanium rods with titanium VBR resulted in the lowest ROM. Two cross connectors reduced ROM in axial rotation for all instrumentations independently of VBR or rod material. All instrumented states in all planes of motion showed a significantly reduced ROM. No significant differences were detected between the VBR materials in all planes of motion. Less rigid CF/PEEK rods in combination with the CF/PEEK VBR without cross connectors showed the smallest reduction in ROM. Independently of VBR and rod material; two cross connectors significantly reduced ROM in axial rotation. Compared to titanium rods; the use of CF/PEEK rods results in higher ROM. The stiffness of rod material has more influence on the ROM than the stiffness of VBR material.

Indexed as

biomechanicsCF/PEEKnon metallicradiolucentspinetumorVertebral body replacement (VBR)vertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID31454960
PMCPMC6747954
OpenAlexW2969473652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.