Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31454828›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2020

Language nutrition for language health in children with disorders: a scoping review.

Janet Y Bang, Aubrey S Adiao, Virginia A Marchman, Heidi M Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet Y BangDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aubrey S AdiaoDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Virginia A MarchmanDepartment of Psychology, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Heidi M FeldmanDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. hfeldman@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Predicting language processing efficiency in preterm children: Social-environmental and neuro-biological factorsR01HD069150 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, HEIDI M. · 2011 to 2024
$5.8M
Early language processing skill and school-relevant outcomes in emerging bilingual studentsR01HD092343 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERNALD, ANNE · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069150NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantity and quality of child-directed speech-language nutrition-provided to typically-developing children is associated with language outcomes-language health. Limited information is available about child-directed speech to children at biological risk of language impairments. We conducted a scoping review on caregiver child-directed speech for children with three clinical conditions associated with language impairments-preterm birth, intellectual disability, and autism-addressing three questions: (1) How does child-directed speech to these children differ from speech to typically-developing children? (2) What are the associations between child-directed speech and child language outcomes? (3) How convincing are intervention studies that aim to improve child-directed speech and thereby facilitate children's language development? We identified 635 potential studies and reviewed 57 meeting study criteria. Child-directed speech to children with all conditions was comparable to speech to language-matched children; caregivers were more directive toward children with disorders. Most associations between child-directed speech and outcomes were positive. However, several interventions had minimal effects on child language. Trials with large samples, intensive interventions, and multiple data sources are needed to evaluate child-directed speech as a means to prevent language impairment. Clinicians should counsel caregivers to use high quality child-directed speech and responsive communication styles with children with these conditions.

Indexed as

Child LanguageParent-Child RelationsAge FactorsAutistic DisorderCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntellectual DisabilityNonverbal CommunicationPersons with Intellectual DisabilitiesVerbal Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31454828
PMCPMC6962542
OpenAlexW2971049111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.