Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31454628›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2019

The parameter Houlihan: A solution to high-throughput identifiability indeterminacy for brutally ill-posed problems.

David J Albers, Matthew E Levine, Lena Mamykina, George Hripcsak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David J AlbersDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, PH-20, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Informatics, University of Colorado Medicine, Mail: F443, 13199 E. Montview Blvd. Ste: 210-12 | Aurora, CO 80045 USA. Electronic address: david.albers@cuanschutz.edu.
Matthew E LevineDepartment of Computational and Mathematical sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd M/C 305-16 Pasadena, CA 91125 USA.
Lena MamykinaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, PH-20, New York, NY, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, PH-20, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
Mechanistic Machine LearningR01LM012734 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ALBERS, DAVID J., GLUCKMAN, BRUCE J · 2017 to 2019
$2.0M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One way to interject knowledge into clinically impactful forecasting is to use data assimilation, a nonlinear regression that projects data onto a mechanistic physiologic model, instead of a set of functions, such as neural networks. Such regressions have an advantage of being useful with particularly sparse, non-stationary clinical data. However, physiological models are often nonlinear and can have many parameters, leading to potential problems with parameter identifiability, or the ability to find a unique set of parameters that minimize forecasting error. The identifiability problems can be minimized or eliminated by reducing the number of parameters estimated, but reducing the number of estimated parameters also reduces the flexibility of the model and hence increases forecasting error. We propose a method, the parameter Houlihan, that combines traditional machine learning techniques with data assimilation, to select the right set of model parameters to minimize forecasting error while reducing identifiability problems. The method worked well: the data assimilation-based glucose forecasts and estimates for our cohort using the Houlihan-selected parameter sets generally also minimize forecasting errors compared to other parameter selection methods such as by-hand parameter selection. Nevertheless, the forecast with the lowest forecast error does not always accurately represent physiology, but further advancements of the algorithm provide a path for improving physiologic fidelity as well. Our hope is that this methodology represents a first step toward combining machine learning with data assimilation and provides a lower-threshold entry point for using data assimilation with clinical data by helping select the right parameters to estimate.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalAdultBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansInsulinMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseInsulinData assimilationIdentifiabilityInverse problemsMachine learningMarkov Chain Monte CarloPhysiology

Identifiers

PMID31454628
PMCPMC6759390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.