ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2020
Pathological responses to single-pulse electrical stimuli in epilepsy: The role of feedforward inhibition.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodologies to detect cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- The Neurostimulationist will see you now: prescribing direct electrical stimulation therapies for the human brain in epilepsy and beyond.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Four-dimensional tractography animates propagations of neural activation via distinct interhemispheric pathways.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Pathological responses to single-pulse electrical stimuli in epilepsy: The role of feedforward inhibition.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delineation of epileptogenic cortex in focal epilepsy patients may profit from single-pulse electrical stimulation during intracranial EEG recordings. Single-pulse electrical stimulation evokes early and delayed responses. Early responses represent connectivity. Delayed responses are a biomarker for epileptogenic cortex, but up till now, the precise mechanism generating delayed responses remains elusive. We used a data-driven modelling approach to study early and delayed responses. We hypothesized that delayed responses represent indirect responses triggered by early response activity and investigated this for 11 patients. Using two coupled neural masses, we modelled early and delayed responses by combining simulations and bifurcation analysis. An important feature of the model is the inclusion of feedforward inhibitory connections. The waveform of early responses can be explained by feedforward inhibition. Delayed responses can be viewed as second-order responses in the early response network which appear when input to a neural mass falls below a threshold forcing it temporarily to a spiking state. The combination of the threshold with noisy background input explains the typical stochastic appearance of delayed responses. The intrinsic excitability of a neural mass and the strength of its input influence the probability at which delayed responses to occur. Our work gives a theoretical basis for the use of delayed responses as a biomarker for the epileptogenic zone, confirming earlier clinical observations. The combination of early responses revealing effective connectivity, and delayed responses showing intrinsic excitability, makes single-pulse electrical stimulation an interesting tool to obtain data for computational models of epilepsy surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.