ArticleBiomacromolecules2019
Plant-Derived Nanocellulose as Structural and Mechanical Reinforcement of Freeze-Cast Chitosan Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulating Schwann cell behavior via functional nerve guidance conduits for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Sustainable synthesis of amino-cellulose nanofibers for biomaterial platforms.Science advances · 2025Article
- Nanocellulose-based porous materials: Regulation and pathway to commercialization in regenerative medicine.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Tensile properties of freeze-cast collagen scaffolds: How processing conditions affect structure and performance in the dry and fully hydrated states.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023Article
- Hierarchical structure formation by crystal growth-front instabilities during ice templating.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Understanding Nanocellulose-Water Interactions: Turning a Detriment into an Asset.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- 3D-Printing of Silk Nanofibrils Reinforced Alginate for Soft Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Hierarchical Structure of Cellulose Nanofibril-Based Foams Explored by Multimodal X-ray Scattering.Biomacromolecules · 2022Article
- 2D and 3D graphical datasets for bamboo-inspired tubular scaffolds with functional gradients: micrographs and tomograms.Data in brief · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite considerable recent interest in micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose as constituents of lightweight structures and scaffolds for applications that range from thermal insulation to filtration, few systematic studies have been reported to date on structure-property-processing correlations in freeze-cast chitosan-nanocellulose composite scaffolds, in general, and their application in tissue regeneration, in particular. Reported in this study are the effects of the addition of plant-derived nanocellulose fibrils (CNF), crystals (CNCs), or a blend of the two (CNB) to the biopolymer chitosan on the structure and properties of the resulting composites. Chitosan-nanocellulose composite scaffolds were freeze-cast at 10 and 1 °C/min, and their microstructures were quantified in both the dry and fully hydrated states using scanning electron and confocal microscopy, respectively. The modulus, yield strength, and toughness (work to 60% strain) were determined in compression parallel and the modulus also perpendicular to the freezing direction to quantify anisotropy. Observed were the preferential alignments of CNCs and/or fibrils parallel to the freezing direction. Additionally, observed was the self-assembly of the nanocellulose into microstruts and microbridges between adjacent cell walls (lamellae), features that affected the mechanical properties of the scaffolds. When freeze-cast at 1 °C/min, chitosan-CNF scaffolds had the highest modulus, yield strength, toughness, and smallest anisotropy ratio, followed by chitosan and the composites made with the nanocellulose blend, and that with crystalline cellulose. These results illustrate that the nanocellulose additions homogenize the mechanical properties of the scaffold through cell-wall material self-assembly, on the one hand, and add architectural features such as bridges and pillars, on the other. The latter transfer loads and enable the scaffolds to resist deformation also perpendicular to the freezing direction. The observed property profile and the materials' proven biocompatibility highlight the promise of chitosan-nanocellulose composites for a large range of applications, including those for biomedical implants and devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.