Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453891›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Trends in the Use of Skilled Nursing Facility and Home Health Care Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.

Ioana Popescu, Neeraj Sood, Sushant Joshi, Peter Huckfeldt, José Escarce, Teryl K Nuckols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ioana PopescuDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
Neeraj SoodSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Sushant JoshiSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Peter HuckfeldtUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
José EscarceDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
Teryl K NuckolsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Vertical Integration and Care Coordination in Post-Acute Care MarketsR01AG046838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SOOD, NEERAJ · 2014 to 2017
$2.8M
Racial and SES disparities in Outcomes of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction ProgramR01HS025394 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ESCARCE, JOSE JULIO, NUCKOLS, TERYL · 2017 to 2018
$788k
Medicare Readmissions Reduction Program: Outcomes, Costs, and Inadvertent EffectsR01HS024284 · AHRQ · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI NUCKOLS, TERYL · 2015 to 2016
$774k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024284AHRQ HHS R01 HS025394NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals with elevated 30-day readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia. To reduce readmissions, hospitals may have increased referrals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health care. RESEARCH

designOutcomes included 30-day postdischarge utilization of SNF and home health care, including any use as well as days of use. Subjects included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who were admitted with AMI, HF, or pneumonia to hospitals subject to the HRRP. Using an interrupted time-series analysis, we compared utilization rates observed after the announcement of the HRRP (April 2010 through September 2012) and after the imposition of penalties (October 2012 through September 2014) with projected utilization rates that accounted for pre-HRRP trends (January 2008 through March 2010). Models included patient characteristics and hospital fixed effects.

resultsFor AMI and HF, utilization of SNF and home health care remained stable overall. For pneumonia, observed utilization of any SNF care increased modestly (1.0%, P<0.001 during anticipation; 2.4%, P<0.001 after penalties) and observed utilization of any home health care services declined modestly (-0.5%, P=0.008 after announcement; -0.7%, P=0.045 after penalties) relative to projections. Beneficiaries with AMI and pneumonia treated at penalized hospitals had higher rates of being in the community 30 days postdischarge.

conclusionsHospitals might be shifting to more intensive postacute care to avoid readmissions among seniors with pneumonia. At the same time, penalized hospitals' efforts to prevent readmissions may be keeping higher proportions of their patients in the community.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMedicarePatient ReadmissionReimbursement, IncentiveSkilled Nursing FacilitiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31453891
PMCPMC6742564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.