Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453763›Full record

ReviewJournal of agromedicine2019

Exposures and Health Effects of Bioaerosols in Seafood Processing Workers - a Position Statement.

Jakob H Bonlokke, Berit Bang, Lisbeth Aasmoe, Anas M Abdel Rahman, Laura N Syron, Eva Andersson, Anna Dahlman-Höglund, Andreas L Lopata, Mohamed Jeebhay

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of agromedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jakob H BonlokkeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-6576
Berit BangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-3793
Lisbeth AasmoeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Anas M Abdel RahmanDepartment of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9527-9424
Laura N SyronWestern States Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Anchorage, AK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1477-996X
Eva AnderssonOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2854-0354
Anna Dahlman-HöglundOccupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-6020
Andreas L LopataAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-9235
Mohamed JeebhayOccupational Medicine Division and Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-9193

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational hazards exist in the processing of seafood both in land-based facilities as well as on board vessels. Recent findings on occupational injury and respiratory health risks among seafood processing workers were presented and discussed at the IFISH5 conference. Particular emphasis was put on the challenges that im/migrant workers encounter, the greater risks onboard factory vessels, especially where processing machinery are retrofitted to older vessels not primarily designed for this purpose, and the difficulties in assessing and preventing bioaerosol exposures and associated respiratory health risks despite recent advances in characterising agents responsible for allergic and non-allergic reactions. Based on appraisal of existing knowledge in the published literature and new findings presented at the conference, recommendations for immediate actions as well as for future research have been proposed. Among these include the importance of improving extraction ventilation systems, optimising machinery performance, enclosure of bioaerosol sources, improved work organization, and making special efforts to identify and support the needs of im/migrant workers to ensure they also benefit from such improvements. There is a need for studies that incorporate longitudinal study designs, have improved exposure and diagnostic methods, and that address seafood processing in countries with high seafood processing activities such as Asia and those that involve im/migrant workers worldwide. The medical and scientific community has an important role to play in prevention but cannot do this in isolation and should cooperate closely with hygienists, engineers, and national and international agencies to obtain better health outcomes for workers in the seafood industry.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthAerosolsAir PollutantsFood HandlingHumansLongitudinal StudiesOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureAerosolsAir PollutantsallergensallergyasthmabioaerosolscrustaceansendotoxinfishrhinitisSeafood

Identifiers

PMID31453763
PMCPMC9048166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.