ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2019
Data Mining Approach for Extraction of Useful Information About Biologically Active Compounds from Publications.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Artificial Intelligence-Powered New Era in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Review
- Identification of Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Viral Infection Progression Based on Text Mining: Case Study for HIV Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cheminformatics and artificial intelligence for accelerating agrochemical discovery.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Chemical named entity recognition in the texts of scientific publications using the naïve Bayes classifier approach.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
- Web-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Resources Facilitate Effective Drug Discovery.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2021Review
- Data and Text Mining Help Identify Key Proteins Involved in the Molecular Mechanisms Shared by SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Automated Extraction of Information From Texts of Scientific Publications: Insights Into HIV Treatment Strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- (Q)SAR Models of HIV-1 Protein Inhibition by Drug-Like Compounds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A lot of high quality data on the biological activity of chemical compounds are required throughout the whole drug discovery process: from development of computational models of the structure-activity relationship to experimental testing of lead compounds and their validation in clinics. Currently, a large amount of such data is available from databases, scientific publications, and patents. Biological data are characterized by incompleteness, uncertainty, and low reproducibility. Despite the existence of free and commercially available databases of biological activities of compounds, they usually lack unambiguous information about peculiarities of biological assays. On the other hand, scientific papers are the primary source of new data disclosed to the scientific community for the first time. In this study, we have developed and validated a data-mining approach for extraction of text fragments containing description of bioassays. We have used this approach to evaluate compounds and their biological activity reported in scientific publications. We have found that categorization of papers into relevant and irrelevant may be performed based on the machine-learning analysis of the abstracts. Text fragments extracted from the full texts of publications allow their further partitioning into several classes according to the peculiarities of bioassays. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach to the comparison of the endpoint values of biological activity and cytotoxicity of reference compounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.