Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453664›Full record

Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2019

Predicting short- and long-term glycated haemoglobin response after insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using machine-learning algorithms.

Sunil B Nagaraj, Grigory Sidorenkov, Job F M van Boven, Petra Denig

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Investigation of the Potential Mechanism ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunil B NagarajDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-4101
Grigory SidorenkovDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-8862
Job F M van BovenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Petra DenigDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the potential of supervised machine-learning techniques to identify clinical variables for predicting short-term and long-term glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) response after insulin treatment initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included patients with T2DM from the Groningen Initiative to Analyse Type 2 diabetes Treatment (GIANTT) database who started insulin treatment between 2007 and 2013 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Short- and long-term responses at 6 (±2) and 24 (±2) months after insulin initiation, respectively, were assessed. Patients were defined as good responders if they had a decrease in HbA1c ≥ 5 mmol/mol or reached the recommended level of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol. Twenty-four baseline clinical variables were used for the analysis and an elastic net regularization technique was used for variable selection. The performance of three traditional machine-learning algorithms was compared for the prediction of short- and long-term responses and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the prediction models.

resultsThe elastic net regularization-based generalized linear model, which included baseline HbA1c and estimated glomerular filtration rate, correctly classified short- and long-term HbA1c response after treatment initiation, with AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI 0.78-0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.84), respectively, and outperformed the other machine-learning algorithms. Using baseline HbA1c alone, an AUC = 0.71 (95% CI 0.65-0.73) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.75) was obtained for predicting short-term and long-term response, respectively.

conclusionsMachine-learning algorithm performed well in the prediction of an individual's short-term and long-term HbA1c response using baseline clinical variables.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincohort studydatabase researchinsulin therapyobservational studyprimary caretype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31453664
PMCPMC6899933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.