ArticleThe Analyst2019
Composition and charge state influence on the ion-neutral collision cross sections of protonated N-linked glycopeptides: an experimental and theoretical deconstruction of coulombic repulsion vs. charge solvation effects.
Article in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Studying Mucin-Derived O-Glycopeptides with Gas-Phase FRET.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Measuring change in glycoprotein structure.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Towards structure-focused glycoproteomics.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- A Pragmatic Guide to Enrichment Strategies for Mass Spectrometry-Based Glycoproteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is of significant interest as a platform for glycoanalysis. While much attention has been focused on the resolution of isomeric carbohydrates and glycoconjugates, another appealing aspect of IMS is the ability to sort different classes of biomolecules into distinct regions of mass vs. mobility space. This capability has potential to greatly simplify glycoproteomic analyses, as glycosylated and non-glycosylated peptides can be rapidly partitioned in the gas phase. Nevertheless, the physical and chemical characteristics of glycopeptides that dictate their mass vs. mobility loci have yet to be systematically investigated. This report presents an IMS study of model protonated glycopeptide ions with systematically varied oligosaccharide topologies, polypeptide sequences, and charge states. In all, over 110 ion-neutral collision cross sections (CCSs) were measured and analyzed in the context of the physicochemical characteristics of the analytes. Glycan size and composition emerged as a decisive factor in dictating the CCS space occupied by the glycopeptides and exerted this influence in a charge state dependent fashion. Furthermore, elongation of the glycan group was found to either increase or decrease glycopeptide CCSs depending on the ion charge state and the size of the glycan. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the gas phase structures and CCSs of selected glycopeptides revealed that the experimental observations were consistent with a glycan size and charge state dependent interplay between destabilizing coulombic repulsion effects (tending to result in more extended structures) and stabilizing charge solvation effects in which the glycan plays a major role (tending to result in more compact structures). Taken together, these IMS and MD findings suggest the possibility of predicting and delineating glycopeptide-enriched regions of mass vs. mobility space for applications in glycoproteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.