Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453443›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2017

The efficacy of vestibular electrical stimulation on patients with unilateral vestibular pathologies.

Ayşe Karan, Hasan Kerem Alptekin, Nalan Çapan, Demirhan Dıraçoğlu, İlknur Saral, Salih Aydın, Cihan Aksoy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05516017 (The Effect of Pinhole Glasses on Vestibular Electrical Stimulation Used in the Treatment of Chronic Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05516017 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Pinhole Glasses on Vestibular Electrical Stimulation Used in the Treatment of Chronic Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsVertigo, PeripheralArmsVestibular Electrical Stimulator and Pinhole Glasses, Vestibular Electrical Stimulator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayşe KaranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty of İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hasan Kerem AlptekinDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Bahçeşehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey.
Nalan ÇapanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty of İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Demirhan DıraçoğluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty of İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
İlknur SaralDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty of Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Salih AydınDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty of İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Cihan AksoyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medicine Faculty of İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to investigate the efficacy of vestibular electrical stimulation (VES) in unilateral vestibular lesions including benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween June 2007 and August 2007, a total of 19 patients diagnosed with BPPV were included in this study and they were randomized into two groups using the 1:1 method. Ten patients were administered medical treatment plus VES (treatment group; 1 male, 9 females; mean age 55.8 years; range 27 to 74 years), whereas nine patients were only administered medicine (control group; 2 males, 6 females; mean age 54.9 years; range 34 to 73 years). Both groups received the same medical treatment throughout the study. Vestibular electrical stimulation was performed for 30 min long twice a day, three times a week; 12 sessions in total with 80 Hz high-frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). Before and after the treatment, patients' severity of dizziness was assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and daily life activities with Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and their duration (sec) of single leg stance with eyes open and closed was recorded.

resultsCompared to prior to the treatment, VAS-dizziness and DHI scores, and the duration of single leg stance on one foot with eyes open and closed at the end of the treatment showed statistically significant improvement in both groups; however, although VES provided a positive contribution, we did not find a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

conclusionIt can be concluded that VES has positive contribution to medical treatment of patients with dizziness due to unilateral vestibular lesions; however the results of this study should be further investigated with larger groups of patients.

Indexed as

Unilateral vestibular pathologyvestibular electrical stimulationvestibular rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31453443
PMCPMC6648117
OpenAlexW2791648566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.