ArticleIBRO reports2019
Observation of environments with different restorative potential results in differences in eye patron movements and pupillary size.
Article in IBRO reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stressful urban walks: an experimental design for measuring physiological and psychological stress in virtual urban environments.Virtual reality · 2026Article
- Green urban environments enhance brain-to-brain synchrony.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Perceptual fluency and eye movements when viewing urban and natural scenes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Emotional Experiences through Eye-Tracking: A Study of Tourists' Responses to Traditional Village Landscapes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Visual responses of patients with generalized anxiety disorder who cycling in the virtual sportscapes with different tree cover densities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Water and Meadow Views Both Afford Perceived but Not Performance-Based Attention Restoration: Results From Two Experimental Studies.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Differential Impact of Mystery in Nature on Attention: An Oculometric Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Environmental Psychological Restoration (EPR) is the result of the recovery of an antecedent deficit (e.g. stress or attentional fatigue) culminating in a restorative environment exposure. Recent findings suggest that visual contact with nature is important in triggering restorative responses. We measure the behavioral evidence of visual exposure to restorative environments in an eye-tracking study. Eye movement patterns (fixations and pupil dilatation) were evaluated while a sample of participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.