Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453377›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019

eHealth tools for the self-testing of visual acuity: a scoping review.

Wai Kent Yeung, Piers Dawes, Annie Pye, Malcolm Neil, Tariq Aslam, Christine Dickinson, Iracema Leroi

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06076785 (Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06076785 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of ODYSight in the Management of patientS With imparairEd Visual acuitY (ODYSSEY).

TypeobservationalSponsorTilak HealthcareRan2023 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsImpaired Visual AcuityArmsOdySight
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Parental Views of Remote Vision Testing in Children.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A systematic review of reading tests.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wai Kent Yeung1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8456-0635
Piers Dawes2Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Manchester, UK.
Annie Pye1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4152-4260
Malcolm Neil3University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Tariq Aslam4Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Christine Dickinson5Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Iracema Leroi1Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester and the Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncorrected refractive error is a major cause of vision impairment, and is indexed by visual acuity. Availability of vision assessment is limited in low/middle-income countries and in minority groups in high income countries. eHealth tools offer a solution; two-thirds of the globe own mobile devices. This is a scoping review of the number and quality of tools for self-testing visual acuity. Software applications intended for professional clinical use were excluded. Keyword searches were conducted on Google online, Google Play and iOS store. The first 100 hits in each search were screened against inclusion criteria. After screening, 42 tools were reviewed. Tools assessed near and distance vision. About half (

Indexed as

DiagnosisNeuroscienceRefractive errorsVision disordersVisual system

Identifiers

PMID31453377
PMCPMC6706420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.