ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2019
Intracochlear Pressure Changes After Cochlea Implant Electrode Pullback-Reduction of Intracochlear Trauma.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Word Recognition with a Cochlear Implant in Relation to Prediction and Electrode Position.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of Underwater Insertion on Intracochlear Pressure.Frontiers in surgery · 2020Article
- Preservation of Residual Hearing: Long-Term Results With a Mid-Scala Electrode.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDifferent aspects should be considered to achieve an atraumatic insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays as an important surgical goal. Intracochlear pressure changes are known to influence the preservation of residual hearing. By using the intraoperative "pullback technique," an electrode position closer to the modiolus can be achieved than without the pullback. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate to what extent the pullback technique can influence intracochlear pressure changes.
methodsInsertions of cochlear implant electrodes were performed in an artificial cochlear model with two different perimodiolar arrays. Intracochlear pressure changes were recorded with a micro-optical pressure sensor positioned in the apical part of the cochlear. After complete insertion of the electrode array, a so-called pullback of the electrode was performed.
resultsStatistically significant pressure differences were measured if the electrode array was wet (ie, moisturized) during the pullback. Relative pressure changes in electrodes with smaller total volume are lower than pressure changes in larger electrodes.
conclusionThe preservation of residual hearing and, thus, the resulting postoperative audiological outcome has a major impact on the quality of life of the patients and has become of utmost importance. Intracochlear pressure changes during the pullback manoeuver are small in absolute terms, but can even be still reduced statistically significantly by a moistening the electrode before insertion. Using the pullback technique in cases with residual hearing does not affect the probability of preservation of residual hearing but could lead to a better audiological outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.