Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453355›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2019

Intracochlear Pressure Changes After Cochlea Implant Electrode Pullback-Reduction of Intracochlear Trauma.

Gina Lauer, Julica Uçta, Lars Decker, Arneborg Ernst, Philipp Mittmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preservation of Residual Hearing: Long-Term Results With a Mid-Scala Electrode.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gina LauerDepartment of Otolaryngology at UKB, Hospital of the University of Berlin Charité Medical School Berlin Germany.
Julica UçtaDepartment of Otolaryngology at UKB, Hospital of the University of Berlin Charité Medical School Berlin Germany.
Lars DeckerDepartment of Otolaryngology at UKB, Hospital of the University of Berlin Charité Medical School Berlin Germany.
Arneborg ErnstDepartment of Otolaryngology at UKB, Hospital of the University of Berlin Charité Medical School Berlin Germany.
Philipp MittmannDepartment of Otolaryngology at UKB, Hospital of the University of Berlin Charité Medical School Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-9319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDifferent aspects should be considered to achieve an atraumatic insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays as an important surgical goal. Intracochlear pressure changes are known to influence the preservation of residual hearing. By using the intraoperative "pullback technique," an electrode position closer to the modiolus can be achieved than without the pullback. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate to what extent the pullback technique can influence intracochlear pressure changes.

methodsInsertions of cochlear implant electrodes were performed in an artificial cochlear model with two different perimodiolar arrays. Intracochlear pressure changes were recorded with a micro-optical pressure sensor positioned in the apical part of the cochlear. After complete insertion of the electrode array, a so-called pullback of the electrode was performed.

resultsStatistically significant pressure differences were measured if the electrode array was wet (ie, moisturized) during the pullback. Relative pressure changes in electrodes with smaller total volume are lower than pressure changes in larger electrodes.

conclusionThe preservation of residual hearing and, thus, the resulting postoperative audiological outcome has a major impact on the quality of life of the patients and has become of utmost importance. Intracochlear pressure changes during the pullback manoeuver are small in absolute terms, but can even be still reduced statistically significantly by a moistening the electrode before insertion. Using the pullback technique in cases with residual hearing does not affect the probability of preservation of residual hearing but could lead to a better audiological outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantpreservation of residual hearingpullback

Identifiers

PMID31453355
PMCPMC6703119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.