Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453352›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2019

A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery.

Tanisha S Kashikar, Thomas F Kerwin, Aaron C Moberly, Gregory J Wiet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a randomized, controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The SAPIENS 3D-printed temporal bone model: a real tool for advanced otologic surgery education.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A new 3D-printed temporal bone: 'the SAPIENS'-specific anatomical printed-3D-model in education and new surgical simulations.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. 3D-4K exoscope-assisted temporal bone dissection: a new frontier in surgical training.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Assessment of a virtual reality temporal bone surgical simulator: a national face and content validity study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanisha S KashikarOhio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Athens Ohio U.S.A.
Thomas F KerwinOffice of Research The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio U.S.A.
Aaron C MoberlyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-6916
Gregory J WietDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio U.S.A.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-3206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTemporal bone surgery is a technically challenging and high-risk procedure in an anatomically complex area. Safe temporal bone surgery emphasizes a consummate anatomic understanding and technique development that requires the guidance of an experienced otologic surgeon and years of practice. Temporal bone simulation can augment otologic surgical training and enable rehearsal of surgical procedures.

objectivesThe purpose of this article is to provide an updated review of temporal bone simulation platforms and their uses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature search. Search terms included temporal bone, temporal bone simulation, virtual reality (VR), and presurgical planning and rehearsal. DISCUSSION: Various simulation platforms such as cadaveric bone, three-dimensional (3D) printed models, and VR simulation have been used for temporal bone surgery training. However, each simulation method has its drawbacks. There is a need to improve upon current simulation platforms to enhance surgical training and skills assessment, as well as a need to explore other clinically significant applications of simulation, such as preoperative planning and rehearsal, in otologic surgery.

conclusionsThere is no replacement for actual surgical experience, but high-fidelity temporal bone models such as those produced with 3D printing and computer simulation have emerged as promising tools in otolaryngologic surgery. Improvements in the fidelity of both 3D printed and VR simulators as well as integration of a standardized assessment format would allow for an expansion in the use of these simulation platforms in training and assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Indexed as

preoperative planningsimulationTemporal bonevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31453352
PMCPMC6703115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.