ChIP and Chips: Introducing the WormPharm for correlative studies employing pharmacology and genome-wide analyses in

Jung H Doh, Andrew B Moore, İrem Çelen, Michael T Moore, Chandram R Sabanayagam

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

5citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

Transcriptomic Signature of the Simulated Microgravity Response inCells · 2023
Article
Phenotypic Screening inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
Review
Microfluidic Technologies for High Throughput Screening Through Sorting and On-Chip Culture ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
Review
Inter-generational consequences for growing Caenorhabditis elegans in liquid.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
Article
Effects of liquid cultivation on gene expression and phenotype of C. elegans.BMC genomics · 2018
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jung H DohUniversity of Delaware, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Newark, DE, USA.

Andrew B MooreUniversity of Delaware, Department of Biological Sciences, Newark, DE, USA.

İrem ÇelenUniversity of Delaware, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Newark, DE, USA.

Michael T MooreUniversity of Delaware, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Newark, DE, USA.

Chandram R SabanayagamUniversity of Delaware, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Newark, DE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the WormPharm, an automated microfluidic platform that utilizes an axenic medium to culture

Indexed as

axenicCeHRC. elegansChIP-seqgrowth kineticsWormchipWormPharm

Identifiers

PMID31453211

DOI10.14440/jbm.2016.109

PMCPMC6706132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.