Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453141›Full record

ArticlePlastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)2019

Secondary Rhinoplasty: Aesthetic and Functional Concerns.

Shahriar Loghmani, Alireza Loghmani, Fatemeh Maraki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why Do They Return? A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences and Ethical Dimensions of Revision Rhinoplasty in Iran.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahriar LoghmaniDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Ordibehesht Surgical Center, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza LoghmaniDepartment of Dentistry, Ordibehesht Surgical Center, Isfahan, Iran.
Fatemeh MarakiDepartment of Operating Room, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAesthetic and functional concerns, especially after multiple revision rhinoplasties, continue to provide a challenge even for the experienced surgeon.

objectiveThis study aimed to report the results in terms of "secondary rhinoplasty," performed by the senior author after previous rhinoplasty.

methodsThis descriptive prospective study was carried on 150 patients with surgical indication of secondary rhinoplasty and they were asked to fill out the questionnaire divided into 3 parts: overall epidemiological questions, questions of patients' aesthetic and functional complaints, and objective evaluation by the surgeon. The nasal problems in the upper and middle regions were divided into high or low, broad or narrow, crooked, irregularity of nasal bridge, or other alterations. The patients included in the study had surgical programming of secondary rhinoplasty, with mandatory aesthetic and optional functional purposes, having previous rhinoplasty with the same or different surgeon.

resultsThere were 136 females and 14 males with the mean age of 31.52 (6.36) years. The most common complaints were related to the nose tip with 123 cases included deviated tip and pinched (bilateral) with 25.3%, 30.7%, and 25.3%, middle nose with 78 cases included mid vault deviation, inverted V, and polly beak with 31.3%, 18%, and 9.3%, and upper nasal region with 69 cases included dorsum irregularity and wide dorsum with the rates of 22.7% and 16.7%, respectively; respiratory problem was reported in 13 cases.

conclusionUnilateral or bilateral twisting at the nasal tip had the highest percentages, and the lowest incidence was in relation to the complaints of the upper nasal part.

Indexed as

aestheticfunctionaloutcomessecondary rhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID31453141
PMCPMC6696868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.