Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453022›Full record

ReviewCureus2019

Neonatal Encephalopathies: A Clinical Perspective.

Edgar Andrade, Wilson Chavez, Zakir I Shaikh, Alcy R Torres

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edgar AndradePediatric Neurology, Institute of Pediatric Neurosciences of Florida, Ocala, USA.
Wilson ChavezRadiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Zakir I ShaikhPediatrics, Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat, IND.
Alcy R TorresPediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat · INBoston Medical Center · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seizures are the most acute evident manifestation of central nervous system dysfunction in neonates. The incidence is higher in very low weight neonates, about 58/100 live births, as opposed to full-term infants, estimated about 3.5/100 live births. Neonatal seizures represent the clinical manifestation of a non-specific disorder of cortical cerebral dysfunction, which could lead to permanent brain injury. The etiology is multifactorial and requires a judicious assessment of each clinical scenario. The diagnosis and its management are further complicated as most neonatal seizures may have very subtle or no clinical changes and the diagnosis may be just based on EEG findings, so-called subclinical. The treatment is dependent on the etiology, but early and opportune intervention can prevent further brain damage and improve prognosis. Although early identification and treatment are essential, the diagnosis of neonatal seizures can be further complicated by the clinical presentations, possible etiologies, and treatments. Nevertheless, research studies and clinical evidence have shown that early treatment with anti-seizure medications can change the outcome.

Indexed as

deficienciesencephalopathiesfolateneonatalpiridoxineseizures

Identifiers

PMID31453022
PMCPMC6701909
OpenAlexW2950534453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.