ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Hybrid organosilicon/polyol phantom for photoacoustic imaging.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploiting Bacterial Pigmentation for Non-Destructive Detection of Seed-Borne Pathogens by Using Photoacoustic Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Photoacoustic method for measuring the elasticity of polydimethylsiloxane at various mixing ratios.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Tutorial on methods for estimation of optical absorption and scattering properties of tissue.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Temporal evaluation of efficacy and quality of tissue repair upon laser-activated sealing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Photoacoustic imaging phantoms for assessment of object detectability and boundary buildup artifacts.Photoacoustics · 2022Article
- Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2022Review
- Review of consensus test methods in medical imaging and current practices in photoacoustic image quality assessment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of hardware and software for photoacoustic technologies is urging the establishment of dedicated tools for standardization and performance assessment. In particular, the fabrication of anatomical phantoms for photoacoustic imaging remains an open question, as current solutions have not yet gained unanimous support. Here, we propose that a hybrid material made of a water-in-oil emulsion of glycerol and polydimethylsiloxane may represent a versatile platform to host a broad taxonomy of hydrophobic and hydrophilic dyes and recapitulate the optical and acoustic features of bio tissue. For a full optical parameterization, we refer to Wróbel,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.