Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452902›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2019

Impact of Once- Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus Dosing on Medication Adherence in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Canadian Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Theone S E Paterson, Maryam Demian, Rebecca Jean Shapiro, Wendy Loken Thornton

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01334333 (Comparison of Medication Adherence Between Once Daily Tacrolimus), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01334333 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Medication Adherence Between Once Daily Tacrolimus (Advagraf®) and Twice Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf®) Administration in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients - a Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2011 to 2018Enrolled46ConditionsRenal Disease, Renal TransplantArmsTacrolimus - Prograf® twice daily formulation, Tacrolimus - Advagraf® once daily formulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Theone S E PatersonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Maryam DemianDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Rebecca Jean ShapiroFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Wendy Loken ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1907-0781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalence of immunosuppressant nonadherence in renal transplant recipients is high despite negative clinical outcomes associated with nonadherence. Simplification of dosing has been demonstrated to improve adherence in renal transplant recipients as measured through electronic monitoring and self-report.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to replicate and extend previous findings by measuring adherence with multiple methods in a Canadian sample.

designThe study design was a randomized controlled medication dosing trial in adult renal transplant patients. The trial length was 4 months.

settingThis study was conducted within the Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) Clinic at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH; Vancouver, Canada). PATIENTS: A total of 46 adult renal recipients (at least 1 year post-transplant) were recruited through the SOT clinic. With 8 withdrawals, 38 individuals completed all phases of the study. MEASUREMENTS: Medication adherence was measured for a period of 4 months using multiple methods, including electronic monitoring (MEMS [Medication Event Monitoring System]), pharmacy refill data (medication possession ratio [MPR]), and by self-report using the Adherence subscale of the Transplant Effects Questionnaire (TEQ).

methodsParticipants were randomized to twice-daily (n = 19) or once-daily tacrolimus dosing (n = 19) and followed over a 4-month period via monthly clinic study visits. Comparisons between the treatment groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney

resultsAs outlined in Table 3, the once-daily dosing group showed significantly better MEMS Dose Adherence ( LIMITATIONS: Limitations included small sample size and short follow-up period, precluding the examination of clinical outcome differences.

conclusionsResults for dose adherence replicate the finding that dose simplification increases adherence to immunosuppressants as measured through electronic monitoring. Such an advantage for the once-daily dosing group was not seen across the 2 other electronic monitoring measurement variables (days and timing adherence). This study extends previous research by examining adherence in once versus twice-daily dosing via prescription refill data in a Canadian sample. Given the gravity of potential health outcomes associated with nonadherence, although results indicate inconsistencies in significance testing across measurement methods, the medium to large effect sizes seen in the data favoring better adherence with once-daily dosing provide an indication of the potential clinical significance of these findings.

trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01334333) on April 11, 2011.

Indexed as

Advagrafelectronic monitoringmedication adherencePrografrenal transplantationtacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID31452902
PMCPMC6699008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.