ArticleInternational journal of person centered medicine2017
Provider and Consumer Behaviors and their Interaction for Measuring Person-Centered Care.
Article in International journal of person centered medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consumer personas for CPAP purchasing in older adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a hospital database study.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Patient involvement in the biopsychosocial integrated primary care model: A qualitative study in three health districts of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent research has found that higher rates of person-centered care (PCC) are associated with greater treatment adherence and positive treatment outcomes. However, the instruments used to access PCC primarily collect data on provider behavior, rather than consumer participation in PCC, despite the necessary co-equal and collaborative nature of PCC interactions.
objectivesThe objective of the current study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) consumer information subscale and the consumer decision making subscale are not correlated with the PPPC subscales and, (2) consumer perceptions of person-centeredness and of consumer involvement in care are significant independent explanatory variables for the theoretically or quantitatively grounded outcomes of therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.
methodsCross-sectional survey data was collected from 82 mental health care consumers receiving services at two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Participants completed surveys on perceptions of PCC, consumer involvement in care, therapeutic alliance, medication adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.
resultsSignificant correlation between the consumer participation and PCC subscales was mixed. Higher levels of PCC were associated with greater therapeutic alliance, less suspicion of mental health care systems, less perception of lack of support from providers, and less beliefs about group disparities in care. Consumer involvement was only significantly related to suspicion of mental health care systems. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThese findings may be a function of the locus of each outcome variable. When conducting PCC research investigators should consider how the outcomes they are examining inform the method through which they measure patient-centeredness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31452868PMC6709667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.