Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452827›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2018

Evaluation of the adverse events following immunization surveillance system in Guruve district, Mashonaland Central 2017.

Mutata Constantine, Tshuma Cremance, Tsitsi Patience Juru, Shambira Gerald, Gombe Tafara Notion, Nsubuga Peter, Tshimanga Mufuta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mutata ConstantineUniversity of Zimbabwe, Department of Community Medicine, Zimbabwe.
Tshuma CremanceProvincial Medical Director, Mashonaland Central Province, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi Patience JuruUniversity of Zimbabwe, Department of Community Medicine, Zimbabwe.
Shambira GeraldUniversity of Zimbabwe, Department of Community Medicine, Zimbabwe.
Gombe Tafara NotionUniversity of Zimbabwe, Department of Community Medicine, Zimbabwe.
Nsubuga PeterGlobal Public Health Solutions, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tshimanga MufutaUniversity of Zimbabwe, Department of Community Medicine, Zimbabwe.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn adverse event following immunisation is any untoward medical occurrence which follows vaccination. Frequency of adverse events ranges from 13% to 34% and they should be reported regardless of severity. From the beginning of 2016 to mid-2017, Guruve district in Zimbabwe did not report any AEFIs. This suggests the surveillance system may be failing to detect adverse events. We therefore evaluated the AEFI surveillance system in Guruve district.

methodsWe conducted a surveillance system evaluation using the updated Centers for Disease Control guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. We interviewed health workers and caregivers of babies under 2 years in Guruve district. We also reviewed all records on AEFI surveillance for the period of January 2016 to November 2017.

resultsWe recruited 31 health workers and 33 caregivers into the study. Between January 2016 and mid-2017, 39% of the caregivers had children who had suffered AEFIs and 45% of the health workers had encountered AEFIs but none had been notified. The main reasons for failure to report AEFIs included health workers' fear of personal consequences and caregivers thinking that an adverse event was not serious enough to report. Knowledge of the surveillance system was good amongst the majority of health workers. All the resources needed by the surveillance system were available.

conclusionWe concluded that health workers in Guruve district were afraid to report adverse events following immunization and caregivers were reluctant to report mild adverse events hence the surveillance system was performing poorly and was not useful. However, the stability of the system and the good knowledge gives a good foundation for improving the surveillance system.

Indexed as

Public Health SurveillanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCaregiversFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansImmunizationInfantInterviews as TopicMaleVaccinesZimbabweVaccinesAEFIGuruvesurveillancevaccinationZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID31452827
PMCPMC6693787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.