Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452797›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

A comparative study on superb microvascular imaging and conventional ultrasonography in differentiating BI-RADS 4 breast lesions.

Yi-Cheng Zhu, Dao-Ming Zu, Yuan Zhang, Jun Shan, Xiu-Rong Shi, Shu-Hao Deng, Quan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Translating new breast ultrasound techniques into clinical practice: evaluating their intended uses and describing other unexpected uses for them.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
  10. The application value of CDFI and SMI combined with serological markers in distinguishing benign and malignant thyroid nodules.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi-Cheng ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Dao-Ming ZuDepartment of Minor Surgery, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Yuan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Jun ShanDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Xiu-Rong ShiDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Shu-Hao DengDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.
Quan JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201299, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in differentiating Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 breast lesions compared with conventional ultrasonography (US). A total of 111 patients with 116 breast lesions underwent grayscale ultrasound (US), colour Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and SMI breast imaging between February 2016 and May 2018. CDFI and SMI were performed to evaluate vascular quantity, morphology, and distribution characteristics. The detection of malignancy was compared between grayscale US alone, US + CDFI and US + SMI in terms of the BI-RADS stratification system. SMI was observed to be significantly more accurate in distinguishing malignant breast lesions (86.67%) compared with CDFI (80.00%) (P<0.001). Among malignant lesions, SMI detected 80.00% of those that contained ≥4 vessels, while CDFI only detected 56.67%. Penetrating and branching vessels were identified by SMI in 53.33% of malignant breast lesions and by CDFI in 10.00%. There was no significant difference in vascular distribution by SMI (P=0.094) and by CDFI (P=0.087). US + SMI was associated with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates (86.67, 83.72 and 84.48%, respectively) compared with US + CDFI (80.00, 72.09 and 74.14%, respectively). The area under the curve values from receiver operating characteristic analysis of US + SMI, US + CDFI and US alone were 0.852 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.768-0.936)] 0.760 (95% CI: 0.660-0.860), 0.698 (95% CI: 0.589-0.807), respectively (P<0.001). SMI yielded more detailed vascular information associated with malignant breast masses when compared with conventional US. Therefore, as an adjunct to grayscale, SMI exhibited a markedly improved diagnostic capability in distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions, particularly those of BI-RADS category 4.

Indexed as

breast imaging reportingbreast lesionscolour Doppler flow imagingdata systemsuperb microvascular imagingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31452797
PMCPMC6676576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.