Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452520›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2019

Characterizing Participation and Perceived Engagement Benefits in an Integrated Digital Behavioral Health Recovery Community for Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Brenda Curtis, Brandon Bergman, Austin Brown, Jessica McDaniel, Kristen Harper, Emily Eisenhart, Mariel Hufnagel, Anne Thompson Heller, Robert Ashford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital Help for Substance Users (SU): A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Women-Reported Barriers and Facilitators of Continued Engagement with Medications for Opioid Use Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda Curtis *National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2511-3322
Brandon BergmanRecovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2427-4738
Austin BrownCenter for Young Adult Addiction and Recovery, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9958-3696
Jessica McDanielCenter for Young Adult Addiction and Recovery, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-677X
Kristen HarperRecovery Cube, Lake Lanier, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-7129
Emily EisenhartGeorgia Southern University, Statesboror, GA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-5616
Mariel HufnagelThe Ammon Foundation, Linden, NJ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0006-4093
Anne Thompson HellerUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-5725
Robert Ashford *Substance Use Disorders Institute, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3979-1754
Kennesaw State University · USCube Technology (United States) · USGeorgia Southern University · USHarvard University · USLinde (United States) · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of the Sciences · US

Funding

Predicting AOD Relapse and Treatment Completion from Social Media UseR01DA039457 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI UNGAR, LYLE · 2014 to 2016
$1.6M
Funded extension request for "Expanding recovery support for emerging adults with alcohol use disorder: Training in the science of social network sites"K23AA025707 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BERGMAN, BRANDON G. · 2018 to 2023
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA025707NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests that digital recovery support services (D-RSSs) may help support individual recovery and augment the availability of in-person supports. Previous studies highlight the use of D-RSSs in supporting individuals in recovery from substance use but have yet to examine the use of D-RSSs in supporting a combination of behavioral health disorders, including substance use, mental health, and trauma. Similarly, few studies on D-RSSs have evaluated gender-specific supports or integrated communities, which may be helpful to women and individuals recovering from behavioral health disorders.

objectiveThe goal of this study was to evaluate the SHE RECOVERS (SR) recovery community, with the following 3 aims: (1) to characterize the women who engage in SR (including demographics and recovery-related characteristics), (2) describe the ways and frequency in which participants engage with SR, and (3) examine the perception of benefit derived from engagement with SR.

methodsThis study used a cross-sectional survey to examine the characteristics of SR participants. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests, as well as univariate logistic regressions, were used to explore each aim.

resultsParticipants (N=729, mean age 46.83 years; 685/729, 94% Caucasian) reported being in recovery from a variety of conditions, although the most frequent nonexclusive disorder was substance use (86.40%, n=630). Participants had an average length in recovery (LIR) of 6.14 years (SD 7.87), with most having between 1 and 5 years (n=300). The most frequently reported recovery pathway was abstinence-based 12-step mutual aid (38.40%). Participants reported positive perceptions of benefit from SR participation, which did not vary by LIR or recovery pathway. Participants also had high rates of agreement, with SR having a positive impact on their lives, although this too did vary by recovery length and recovery pathway. Participants with 1 to 5 years of recovery used SR to connect with other women in recovery at higher rates, whereas those with less than 1 year used SR to ask for resources at higher rates, and those with 5 or more years used SR to provide support at higher rates. Lifetime engagement with specific supports of SR was also associated with LIR and recovery pathway.

conclusionsGender-specific and integrated D-RSSs are feasible and beneficial from the perspective of participants. D-RSSs also appear to provide support to a range of recovery typologies and pathways in an effective manner and may be a vital tool for expanding recovery supports for those lacking in access and availability because of geography, social determinants, or other barriers.

Indexed as

mental healthmHealthrehabilitationsubstance addictionsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID31452520
PMCPMC6732973
OpenAlexW2943415851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.