Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452416›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2019

Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Anders M Refsum, Uy V Nguyen, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Birgitte Espehaug, Anne M Fenstad, Regina K Lein, Peter Ellison, Paul J Høl, Ove Furnes

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Higher bone cement volume in total knee arthroplasty lowers the risk of postoperative radiolucent lines.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anders M RefsumDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Uy V NguyenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Jan-Erik GjertsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Birgitte EspehaugCentre for Evidence-Based Practice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen.
Anne M FenstadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen.
Regina K LeinMedical Library, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Peter EllisonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen.
Paul J HølDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Ove FurnesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - The optimal cementing technique for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. We therefore performed a scoping review based on available studies regarding cementation technique in primary TKA and unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA).Patients and methods - A search in 3 databases identified 1,554 studies. The inclusion criteria were literature that studied cementing technique in primary TKA or UKA. This included cement application methods, full or surface cementing, applying cement to the bone and/or prosthesis, stabilization of the implant during curing phase, bone irrigation technique, drilling holes in the bone, use of suction, and the timing of cementation. 57 studies met the inclusion criteria.Results - The evidence was unanimously in favor of pulsatile lavage irrigation, drying the bone, and drilling holes into the tibia during a TKA. All studies concerning suction recommended it during TKA cementation. 7 out of 11 studies favored the use of a cement gun and no studies showed that finger packing was statistically significantly better than using a cement gun. There is evidence that full cementation should be used if metal-backed tibial components are used. Applying the cement to both implant and bone seems to give better cement penetration.Interpretation - There are still many knowledge gaps regarding cementing technique in primary TKA. There seems to be sufficient evidence to recommend pulsatile lavage irrigation of the bone, drilling multiple holes, and drying the bone before cementing and implant insertion, and applying cement to both implant and on the bone.

Indexed as

Bone CementsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCementationHumansBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID31452416
PMCPMC6844414
OpenAlexW2971036526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.