Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452191›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2019

Formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants.

Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Verena Walsh, William McGuire

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Docosahexaenoic Acid and Sleep Quality in Very and Extreme Preterm Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mixed Feedings and Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The Proportion of Human Milk Matters.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer Valeska Elli BrownCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Verena Walsh
William McGuire

Funding

Department of Health SRP/16/114/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial formula can be manipulated to contain higher amounts of macro-nutrients than maternal breast milk but breast milk confers important immuno-nutritional advantages for preterm or low birth weight (LBW) infants.

objectivesTo determine the effect of feeding preterm or LBW infants with formula compared with maternal breast milk on growth and developmental outcomes. SEARCH

methodsWe used the standard strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2018, Issue 9), and Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Maternity & Infant Care Database, and CINAHL to October 2018. We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared feeding preterm or low birth weight infants with formula versus maternal breast milk. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors planned independently to assess trial eligibility and risk of bias, and extract data. We planned to analyse treatment effects as described in the individual trials and report risk ratios and risk differences for dichotomous data, and mean differences for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals. We planned to use a fixed-effect model in meta-analyses and to explore potential causes of heterogeneity in subgroup analyses. We planned to use the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN

resultsWe did not identify any eligible trials. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere are no trials of formula versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Such trials are unlikely to be conducted because of the difficulty of allocating an alternative form of nutrition to an infant whose mother wishes to feed with her own breast milk. Maternal breast milk remains the default choice of enteral nutrition because observational studies, and meta-analyses of trials comparing feeding with formula versus donor breast milk, suggest that feeding with breast milk has major immuno-nutritional advantages for preterm or low birth weight infants.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, PrematureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID31452191
PMCPMC6710607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.