Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452081›Full record

Observational studyNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2020

Extending the Interval of Natalizumab Dosing: Is Efficacy Preserved?

Marinella Clerico, Stefania Federica De Mercanti, Alessio Signori, Marco Iudicello, Cinzia Cordioli, Elisabetta Signoriello, Giacomo Lus, Simona Bonavita, Luigi Lavorgna, Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy and safety of extended-interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with subgroup evaluation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pro-Inflammatory c-MetAnnals of neurology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Multiple Sclerosis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Marinella ClericoClinical and Biological Sciences Department, Neurology Unit, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Regione Gonzole, 10, Orbassano, 10043, Turin, Italy.
Stefania Federica De MercantiClinical and Biological Sciences Department, Neurology Unit, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Regione Gonzole, 10, Orbassano, 10043, Turin, Italy. sdemercanti@yahoo.it.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Marco IudicelloClinical and Biological Sciences Department, Neurology Unit, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Regione Gonzole, 10, Orbassano, 10043, Turin, Italy.
Cinzia CordioliMultiple Sclerosis Center, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Presidio di Montichiari, Brescia, Italy.
Elisabetta SignorielloDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Giacomo LusDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Aging Sciences, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Simona BonavitaClinic of Neurology, AOU - University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Luigi LavorgnaClinic of Neurology, AOU - University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giorgia Teresa ManiscalcoNeurological Clinic and Multiple Sclerosis Centre of "AORN A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy.
Erica CurtiNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Lorena LoreficeMultiple Sclerosis Center, Binaghi Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Eleonora CoccoMultiple Sclerosis Center, Binaghi Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Viviana NocitiMultiple Sclerosis Center, Neuroscience Area, Neuroscience, Aging, Head and Neck and Orthopaedics Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Massimiliano MirabellaMultiple Sclerosis Center, Neuroscience Area, Neuroscience, Aging, Head and Neck and Orthopaedics Sciences Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Damiano BaronciniCentro Sclerosi Multipla - Presidio ospedaliero di Gallarate - ASST Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy.
Giorgia MataluniUOSD Centro di Riferimento Regionale Sclerosi Multipla - Dipartimento di Neuroscienze Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Doriana LandiUOSD Centro di Riferimento Regionale Sclerosi Multipla - Dipartimento di Neuroscienze Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Martina PetruzzoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Roberta LanzilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Ilaria GandogliaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Alice LaroniIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Rita FrangiamoreDepartment of Neuroimmunology and Neuromuscular Diseases, Neurological Institute C. Besta, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy.
Arianna SartoriNeurology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Univeristaria Integrata Clinica Neurologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Paola CavallaDepartment of Neuroscience, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Gianfranco CostantiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Maria Pia SormaniDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Ruggero CapraMultiple Sclerosis Center, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Presidio di Montichiari, Brescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extending the natalizumab interval after the 24th administration could reduce the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The objective is to evaluate the noninferiority of the efficacy of an extended interval dosing (EID) compared with the standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab. It is an observational, multicenter (14 Italian centers), retrospective cohort study, starting from the 24th natalizumab infusion to the loss of follow-up or 2 years after baseline. Patients were grouped in 2 categories according to the mean number of weeks between doses: < 5 weeks, SID; ≥ 5 weeks, EID. Three hundred and sixty patients were enrolled. Median dose interval (MDI) following 24th infusion was 4.7 weeks, with a bimodal distribution (modes at 4 and 6 weeks). Two hundred and sixteen patients were in the SID group (MDI = 4.3 weeks) and 144 in the EID group (MDI 6.2 weeks). Annualized relapse rate was 0.060 (95% CI = 0.033-0.087) in the SID group and 0.039 (95% CI = 0.017-0.063) in the EID group. The non-inferiority of EID versus SID was satisfied. In conclusion, there is no evidence of a reduced efficacy of natalizumab in an EID setting. This observation confirms previous results and together with the emerging evidence of a reduced risk of PML associated to an EID, supports the need of a randomized study to assess the need to change the standard of the natalizumab dosing schedule.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsItalyLeukoencephalopathy, Progressive MultifocalMaleNatalizumabRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorsNatalizumabefficacyextended doseMultiple sclerosisnatalizumabprogressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID31452081
PMCPMC7007494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.