ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020
Translation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials to Everyday Practice.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03850912 (SIMPRO Research Center), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SIMPRO Research Center: Integration and Implementation of PROs for Symptom Management in Oncology Practice
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Current Landscape of Remote Digital Symptom Monitoring for Patients With Lung Cancer: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Addressing social needs in oncology care: another research-to-practice gap.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- How to select and understand guidelines for patient-reported outcomes: a scoping review of existing guidance.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Observational
- The Adolescent and Young Adult Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB): A single-arm feasibility pilot study.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2024Article
- Developing a core set of patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experience measures for peritoneal surface malignancies (COMETE).The British journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Creation and Psychometric Validation of the Sexual Minorities and Prostate Cancer Scale (SMACS) in Sexual Minority Patients-The Restore-2 Study.The journal of sexual medicine · 2022Article
- A review of patient-reported outcomes used for regulatory approval of oncology medicinal products in the European Union between 2017 and 2020.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Harmonizing evidence-based practice, implementation context, and implementation strategies with user-centered design: a case example in young adult cancer care.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Patient-Reported Outcomes-Bench to Bedside.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Developing and Sustaining an Effective and Resilient Oncology Careforce: Opportunities for Action.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Article
- Prioritizing the Patient Perspective in Oncologic Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeClinical trials in oncology evaluating the effects of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) collection have found that monitoring of symptoms with PROs is associated with improved clinical care through reduced acute care utilization and decreased patient symptom burden. This educational review will evaluate strategies for systematic PRO integration into everyday oncology clinical practice.
methodsWe outline key considerations for using PROs in clinical practice, highlighting evidence from published studies. We also discuss the benefits and challenges of PRO implementation in oncology.
resultsImplementing PRO collection in clinical practice can improve care delivery and facilitate patient-centered clinical research. Considerations for using PROs in clinical practice include choice of instrument, method of delivery, and frequency of query. Challenges with implementing systematic PRO collection include the costs and resources needed for implementation, impact on clinical workflow, and controlling/monitoring physician burnout.
conclusionsWhile challenges exist in terms of financial resources and staff participation/burnout, patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice provide a number of benefits, including symptom monitoring, clinical research, and potential real-time personalized clinical-decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.