Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31452029›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy.

Nancy L Schoenborn, Norah L Crossnohere, Ellen M Janssen, Craig E Pollack, Cynthia M Boyd, Antonio C Wolff, Qian-Li Xue, Jacqueline Massare, Marcela Blinka, John F P Bridges

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Public Perspectives on Multi-Cancer Early Detection: A Qualitative Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy L SchoenbornThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. nancyli@jhmi.edu.
Norah L CrossnohereThe Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ellen M JanssenCenter for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Craig E PollackThe Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cynthia M BoydThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Antonio C WolffThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Qian-Li XueThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jacqueline MassareThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marcela BlinkaThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John F P BridgesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USThe Ohio State University · USCenter for Medical Technology Policy · US

Funding

Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
Improving cancer screening in older adults with limited life expectancyK76AG059984 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBORN, NANCY · 2018 to 2021
$972k
Understanding Older Adults' Perspectives on How to Incorporate Life Expectancy in Cancer ScreeningR03AG050912 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBORN, NANCY · 2015 to 2016
$243k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059984NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMany older adults receive unnecessary screening colonoscopies. We previously conducted a survey using a national online panel to assess older adults' preferences for how clinicians can discuss stopping screening colonoscopies. We sought to assess the generalizability of those results by comparing them to a sample of older adults with low health literacy.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingBaltimore metropolitan area (low health literacy sample) and a national, probability-based online panel-KnowledgePanel (national sample).

participantsAdults 65+ with low health literacy measured using a single-question screen (low health literacy sample, n = 113) and KnowledgePanel members 65+ who completed survey about colorectal cancer screening (national sample, n = 441). MEASUREMENTS: The same survey was administered to both groups. Using the best-worst scaling method, we assessed relative preferences for 13 different ways to explain stopping screening colonoscopies. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify the relative preference for each explanation, where a higher preference weight indicates stronger preference. We analyzed each sample separately, then compared the two samples using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the likelihood ratio test to assess for overall differences between the two sets of preference weights, and the Wald test to assess differences in preference weights for each individual phrases.

resultsThe responses from the two samples were highly correlated (Spearman's coefficient 0.92, p < 0.0001). The most preferred phrase to explain stopping screening colonoscopy was "Your other health issues should take priority" in both groups. The three least preferred options were also the same for both groups, with the least preferred being "The doctor does not give an explanation." The explanation that referred to "quality of life" was more preferred by the low health literacy group whereas explanations that mentioned "unlikely to benefit" and "high risk for harms" were more preferred by the national survey group (all p < 0.001).

conclusionAmong two different populations of older adults with different health literacy levels, the preferred strategies for clinicians to discuss stopping screening colonoscopies were highly correlated. Our results can inform effective communication about stopping screening colonoscopies in older adults across different health literacy levels.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMalePatient PreferenceQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairescancer screeningcolorectal cancercommunicationhealth literacypatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID31452029
PMCPMC6848333
OpenAlexW2970916530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.