ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019
Validation of prognostic impact of number of extrathoracic metastases according to the eighth TNM classification: a single-institution retrospective study in Japan.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer, the M1b and M1c descriptors are newly defined by the number of extrathoracic metastases. To verify the prognostic value of these descriptors in Japan, we reclassified our cases and re-evaluated prognosis in M1b and M1c patients.
methodsAll non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastases who visited Saitama Medical Center from 2010 to 2016 were evaluated, divided according to the eighth edition of the TNM classification criteria into two groups (M1b, patients with single extrathoracic metastasis, and M1c, patients with multiple extrathoracic metastases), and followed up until December 31, 2017. Survival time analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and between-group differences in overall survival time (OS) were evaluated by the log-rank test.
resultsA total of 231 NSCLC patients were divided into 57 patients with M1b and 174 with M1c. Median OS was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-19.9) and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.7-10.7) for M1b and M1c, respectively, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.239). However, after excluding patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) fusion gene, median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI 7.2-19.9) for M1b and 5.4 months (95% CI 3.8-6.3) for M1c, respectively, showing a significant difference (P = 0.029).
conclusionsThe effect of therapy directed toward EGFR mutation or EML4-ALK fusion gene might obscure the significant prognostic difference between M1b and M1c.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31452019What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.