Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451911›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2019

Specific intranasal and central trigeminal electrophysiological responses in Parkinson's disease.

Cécilia Tremblay, Rosa Emrich, Annachiara Cavazzana, Lisa Klingelhoefer, Moritz D Brandt, Thomas Hummel, Antje Haehner, Johannes Frasnelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson's disease - a literature overview and case series.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Application research and development of objective examination of olfactory function].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cécilia TremblayResearch Chair in Chemosensory Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada. cecilia.tremblay@uqtr.ca.
Rosa EmrichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Annachiara CavazzanaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lisa KlingelhoeferDepartment of Neurology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Moritz D BrandtDepartment of Neurology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas HummelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Antje HaehnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes FrasnelliResearch Chair in Chemosensory Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HU411/18-1Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 2618Parkinson Society Canada JF, 2017-1120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory dysfunction is a frequent early non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). There is evidence that with regard to trigeminal perception, PD-related olfactory dysfunction is different from other olfactory disorders. More specifically, trigeminal sensitivity, when measured behaviorally, was unimpaired in PD patients as opposed to patients with non-Parkinsonian olfactory dysfunction (NPOD). We sought to investigate the trigeminal pathway by measuring electrophysiological recordings from the nasal epithelium and EEG-derived event-related potentials in response to a specific trigeminal stimulus in 21 PD patients and compare them to 23 patients with NPOD and 25 controls (C). The peripheral trigeminal response, as measured by the negative-mucosa potential, showed no difference between patients with PD and controls whereas PD patients showed faster responses than patients with NPOD, the latter having shown slower and larger responses than controls (18 PD, 14 NPOD, 20 C). The central trigeminal response, as measured by event-related potentials, revealed larger early component response in PD patients compared to patients with NPOD (15 PD, 21 NPOD, 23 C). As expected, psychophysical olfactory testing showed impaired olfactory function in both groups of patients as opposed to controls. Discriminant analysis revealed a model that could predict group membership for 80% of participants based on the negative-mucosa potential latency, olfactory threshold and discrimination tests. These results provide novel insights into the pattern of trigeminal activation in PD which will help to differentiate PD-related olfactory loss from NPOD, a crucial step towards establishing early screening batteries for PD including smell tests.

Indexed as

AgedCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal MucosaOlfaction DisordersParkinson DiseaseTrigeminal NerveEvent-related potentialNegative-mucosa potentialOlfactory dysfunctionParkinson’s diseaseTrigeminal system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.