Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451909›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Predictive capacity of baseline hyperreflective dots on the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) outcomes in diabetic macular edema: a multicenter study.

Alejandro Fonollosa, Javier Zarranz-Ventura, Alicia Valverde, Erika Becerra, Carolina Bernal-Morales, Salvador Pastor-Idoate, Miguel Angel Zapata

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandro FonollosaBegiker-Ophthalmology Research Group, Ophthalmology Department, BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain. afonollosacalduch@gmail.com.
Javier Zarranz-VenturaHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia ValverdeHospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Erika BecerraHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carolina Bernal-MoralesHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvador Pastor-IdoateHospital Universitario Vall de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Angel ZapataHospital Universitario Vall de Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Allergan Foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive capacity of the baseline hyperreflective dots (HRDs) on the functional and anatomical response in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Additionally, we assessed the impact of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant on the functional and anatomic outcomes.

methodsRetrospective, multicenter study. The number of HRDs was graded in four different stages: [A] none HRDs; [B] few, 1-10 HRDs; [C] moderate, 11-20 HRDs; and [D] many, ≥ 21 HRDs. For statistical purposes, groups A and B were combined [scarce HRDs (S-HRDs)] and group D was renamed as [abundant HRDs (A-HRDs)]. The primary endpoints were the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) according to baseline HRD stage.

resultsOne hundred eyes from one hundred patients were included in the study. Mean BCVA significantly improved from 52.9 (50.0 to 55.8) letters ETDRS at baseline to 57.2 (54.0 to 60.4) letters at month 6, p = 0.0039. There were no significant differences between the S-HRDs and A-HRD study groups in BCVA. As compared to baseline, CMT reduction was 106.3 (59.8 to 152.7) μm and 94.2 (34.7 to 153.7) μm in S-HRDs and A-HRD groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 each, respectively). Twenty-three (65.7%) and 18 (62.1%) eyes achieved a CMT reduction ≥ 10% in the S-HRD and A-HRD groups, respectively, p = 0.7640. DEX implant significantly reduced the presence of outer nuclear layer (ONL) disruptions (p = 0.0010).

conclusionsThe number of HRDs did not influence either functional or anatomic outcomes. DEX implant significantly decreases the number of eyes with ONL disruptions, which might improve retinal integrity.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedDexamethasoneDiabetic RetinopathyDrug ImplantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsCentral macular thicknessDexamethasoneDiabetic macular edemaHyperreflective dotsOzurdexVisual acuity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.