Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451906›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2020

Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice.

Angie Canning, Rachael Fairhurst, Manbir Chauhan, Kelly A Weir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The effects of oral feeding while on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angie CanningSpeech Pathology Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia. angie.canning@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7616-6731
Rachael FairhurstSpeech Pathology Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia.
Manbir ChauhanNewborn Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia.
Kelly A WeirMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Gold Coast Hospital · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate oral-feeding practices for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) respiratory support. A survey was sent to Neonatal (NICU) and Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) in Australia and New Zealand to explore feeding practices for infants/children receiving nCPAP and HFNC, including criteria for commencing/recommencing oral feeding, frequency of oral feeding, strategies to assist oral feeding, assessment tools, reasons for not orally feeding, existence of written guidelines and staff opinion regarding feeding safety. Seventy-seven individual survey responses were analysed from 49 units from 38 hospitals. Most units (53%) reported that infants/children are 'never or rarely' fed orally on nCPAP compared with 21% on HFNC. 2% of units 'often' feed infants on nCPAP whilst 38% 'often' feed on HFNC. Oral feeding on HFNC is more likely to occur in a NICU (100% sometimes/often) than a PICU (55% sometimes/often) setting. Only 4% of infants are often fed orally on nCPAP versus 54% on HFNC in NICUs. Eighty percent of all units reported they do not have a written policy or guideline that includes feeding recommendations for infants/children receiving non-invasive respiratory supports. Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nCPAP and HFNC is occurring in NICU and PICUs in Australia and NZ. There is varied opinion regarding the safety of oral feeding on nCPAP and HFNC. Further research is recommended, including studies with instrumental assessment of swallow safety and investigation of short and long-term feeding outcomes, to guide clinicians in this area of practice.

Indexed as

AustraliaCannulaChildChild, PreschoolContinuous Positive Airway PressureDeglutition DisordersFeeding MethodsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleNew ZealandPractice Patterns, Physicians'ChildrenHFNCInfantsnCPAPOral feedingSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID31451906
OpenAlexW2970130308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.