Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451863›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021

Underlying disease determines the risk of an open abdomen treatment, final closure, however, is determined by the surgical abdominal history.

Steffi Karhof, Mark Haverkort, Rogier Simmermacher, Falco Hietbrink, Luke Leenen, Karlijn van Wessem

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffi KarhofDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. S.Karhof@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-7304
Mark HaverkortDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rogier SimmermacherDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Falco HietbrinkDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Luke LeenenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karlijn van WessemDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTemporary abdominal closure is frequently used in several situations such as abbreviated surgery in damage control situations or when closing is impossible due to organ distention or increased abdominal pressure. The ultimate goal is to eventually close the fascia; however, little is known about factors predicting abdominal closure. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with the need for open abdomen as well as indicating the possibility of delayed fascial closure after a period of open abdominal treatment.

methodsA retrospective review of all patients that underwent midline laparotomy between January 2008 and December 2012 was performed. Both factors predicting open abdominal treatment and possibility to close the fascia afterwards were identified and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

results775 laparotomies in 525 patients (60% male) were included. 109 patients (21%) had an open abdomen with a mortality rate of 27%. Male gender and acidosis were associated with open abdominal treatment. In 54%, the open abdomen could be closed by delayed fascial closure. The number of laparotomies both before and during temporary abdominal treatment was associated with failure of closure.

conclusionIn this study, male sex and physiological derangement, reflected by acidosis, were independent predictors of open abdominal treatment. Furthermore, the success of delayed fascial closure depends on number of abdominal surgical procedures. Moreover, based on our experiences, we suggest to change modalities early on, to prevent multiple fruitless attempts to close the abdomen.

Indexed as

Open Abdomen TechniquesAcidosisFasciotomyFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyNetherlandsPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsDelayed fascial closureOpen abdomenOpen abdominal treatmentTemporary abdominal closure

Identifiers

PMID31451863
PMCPMC7851030
OpenAlexW2971288684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.