Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451835›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2019

Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Thomas Hehr, René Baumann, Wilfried Budach, Marciana-Nona Duma, Jürgen Dunst, Petra Feyer, Rainer Fietkau, Wulf Haase, Wolfgang Harms, David Krug and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implant-based reconstruction and adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients-current status and DEGRO recommendations.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Thomas HehrMarienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. thomas.hehr@vinzenz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0165-0905
René BaumannSt. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany.
Wilfried BudachHeinrich-Heine-University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marciana-Nona DumaUniversitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Jürgen DunstUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Petra FeyerVivantes Hospital Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany.
Rainer FietkauUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Wulf HaaseSt.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Wolfgang HarmsSt. Claraspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
David KrugUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Marc D PirothHelios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.
Felix SedlmayerParacelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Rainer SouchonUniversity Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Frederick WenzUniversitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Rolf SauerUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Breast Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin-sparing (SSME) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSME) were developed to improve the cosmetic results for breast cancer (BC) patients, both allowing for immediate breast reconstruction. Recommendations for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) are primarily derived from trials where patients were treated by standard mastectomies. Due to their more conservative character, SSME and especially NSME potentially leave more glandular tissue at risk for subclinical disease.

methodsRates and sites of locoregional failures following SSME and NSME plus/minus reconstruction were analyzed regarding tumor stage and biological risk factors. In particular, the role of PMRT in "intermediate"-risk and early stage high-risk breast cancer patients was revisited. Implications on targeting and dose delivery of PMRT were critically reviewed.

resultsThe value of PMRT in stage III BC remains undisputed. For node-negative BC patients, the majority of reports classify clinical and biological features such as tumor size, close surgical margins, premenopausal status, multicentricity, lymphangiosis, triple-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and poor tumor grading as associated with higher rates of locoregional relapse, thus, building an "intermediate" risk group. Surveys revealed that the majority of radiation oncologists use risk-adaptive models also considering the number of coinciding factors for the estimation of recurrence probability following SSME and NSME. Constellations with a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk of >10% are usually triggering the indication for PMRT. There was no common belief that the amount of residual tissue, e.g., tissue thickness over flaps, serves as additional decision aid. Modern treatment planning can ensure optimal dose distribution for PMRT in almost all patients with SSME. There are no reliable data supporting a reduction of the treatment volume from the CTV chest wall, e.g., to the nipple-areola complex, to the dorsal aspect behind the implant volume, the pectoralis muscle, nor the regional interpectoral, axillary, or complete regional lymph nodes only. The omission of a skin bolus in intermediate-risk BC does not compromise oncological safety.

conclusionsFor intermediate-risk as well as early stage high-risk BC patients, the DEGRO Breast Cancer Expert Panel recommends the use of PMRT following SSME and NSME when a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk is likely to be greater than 10%, as estimated by clinical and biological risk factors. Subvolume-only radiation is discouraged outside of trials. The impact of adequate systemic treatment and the value of radiotherapy on optimal locoregional tumor control, with the goal of less than 5% LRR at 10-years follow-up, has to be verified in prospective trials.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMammaplastyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRisk FactorsIntermediate-risk breast cancerLocal recurrenceNipple-sparing mastectomyPMRTPost-mastectomy radiotherapySkin-sparing mastectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.