ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Event-related potentials to single-cycle binaural beats of a pure tone, a click train, and a noise.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Sensitivity to a Break in Interaural Correlation in Frequency-Gliding Noises.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are only few electrophysiological studies on a phenomenon called "binaural beats" (BBs), which is experienced when two tones with frequencies close to each other are dichotically presented to the ears. And, there is no study in which the electrical responses of the brain to BBs of complex sounds are recorded and analyzed. Owing to a recent method based on single-cycle BB stimulation with sub-threshold temporary monaural frequency shifts, we could record the event-related potentials (ERPs) to BBs of a 250-Hz tone as well as those to the BBs of a 250/s click train and to the BBs of a recurrent 4-ms Gaussian noise. Although fundamental components of the click train and noise stimuli were lower in intensity than the tonal stimuli in our experiments, the N1 responses to the BBs of the former two wide-spectrum sounds were recorded with significantly larger amplitudes and shorter latencies than those to the BBs of a tone, suggesting an across-frequency integration of directional information. During a BB cycle of a complex sound, the interaural time differences (ITDs) of the spectral components are all equal to each other at any time; whereas their interaural phase differences (IPDs) are all different. The ITD rather than the IPD should, therefore, be the cue that is relied upon by the binaural mechanism coding the perceived lateral shifts of the sound caused by BBs. This is in line with across-frequency models of human auditory lateralization based on a common ITD, fulfilling a straightness criterion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31451833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.