Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Combining ZooMS and zooarchaeology to study Late Pleistocene hominin behaviour at Fumane (Italy).

Virginie Sinet-Mathiot, Geoff M Smith, Matteo Romandini, Arndt Wilcke, Marco Peresani, Jean-Jacques Hublin, Frido Welker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
52.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A new late Neanderthal from Crimea reveals long-distance connections across Eurasia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. A primer for ZooMS applications in archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Virginie Sinet-MathiotDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. virginie_sinet@eva.mpg.de.
Geoff M SmithDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7155-5140
Matteo RomandiniUniversity of Bologna, Department of Cultural Heritage, Ravenna, Italy.
Arndt WilckeFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Marco PeresaniUniversity of Ferrara, Department of Humanities, Section of Prehistory and Anthropology, Ferrara, Italy. psm@unife.it.
Jean-Jacques HublinDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Frido WelkerDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. frido_welker@eva.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEUniversity of Ferrara · ITFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen type I fingerprinting (ZooMS) has recently been used to provide either palaeoenvironmental data or to identify additional hominin specimens in Pleistocene contexts, where faunal assemblages are normally highly fragmented. However, its potential to elucidate hominin subsistence behaviour has been unexplored. Here, ZooMS and zooarchaeology have been employed in a complementary approach to investigate bone assemblages from Final Mousterian and Uluzzian contexts at Fumane cave (Italy). Both approaches produced analogous species composition, but differ significantly in species abundance, particularly highlighted by a six fold-increase in the quantity of Bos/Bison remains in the molecularly identified component. Traditional zooarchaeological methods would therefore underestimate the proportion of Bos/Bison in these levels to a considerable extent. We suggest that this difference is potentially due to percussion-based carcass fragmentation of large Bos/Bison bone diaphyses. Finally, our data demonstrates high variability in species assignment to body size classes based on bone cortical thickness and fragment size. Thus, combining biomolecular and traditional zooarchaeological methods allows us to refine our understanding of bone assemblage composition associated with hominin occupation at Fumane.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyAnimalsBone and BonesFossilsGeographyHominidaeItalySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID31451791
PMCPMC6710433
OpenAlexW2970524708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.