Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451715›Full record

ReviewJournal of human genetics2020

Bioinformatics of nanopore sequencing.

Wojciech Makałowski, Victoria Shabardina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. VInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. High-QualityFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  16. Nanopore sequencing and its application to the study of microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wojciech MakałowskiInstitute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany. wojmak@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2303-9541
Victoria ShabardinaInstitute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing is one of the most exciting new technologies that undergo dynamic development. With its development, a growing number of analytical tools are becoming available for researchers. To help them better navigate this ever changing field, we discuss a range of software available to analyze sequences obtained using nanopore technology.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanopore Sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.