Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451633›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

The joint influence of intelligence and practice on skill development throughout the life span.

Nemanja Vaci, Peter Edelsbrunner, Elsbeth Stern, Aljoscha Neubauer, Merim Bilalić, Roland H Grabner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computers and chess masters: The role of AI in transforming elite human performance.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Life cycle patterns of cognitive performance over the long run.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nemanja VaciDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Peter EdelsbrunnerDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH Zurich), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Elsbeth SternDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH Zurich), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Aljoscha NeubauerInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Merim BilalićDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, United Kingdom merim.bilalic@northumbria.ac.uk.
Roland H GrabnerInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · ATBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHETH Zurich · CHNorthumbria University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relative importance of different factors in the development of human skills has been extensively discussed. Research on expertise indicates that focused practice may be the sole determinant of skill, while intelligence researchers underline the relative importance of abilities at even the highest level of skill. There is indeed a large body of research that acknowledges the role of both factors in skill development and retention. It is, however, unknown how intelligence and practice come together to enable the acquisition and retention of complex skills across the life span. Instead of focusing on the 2 factors, intelligence and practice, in isolation, here we look at their interplay throughout development. In a longitudinal study that tracked chess players throughout their careers, we show that both intelligence and practice positively affect the acquisition and retention of chess skill. Importantly, the nonlinear interaction between the 2 factors revealed that more intelligent individuals benefited more from practice. With the same amount of practice, they acquired chess skill more quickly than less intelligent players, reached a higher peak performance, and arrested decline in older age. Our research demonstrates the futility of scrutinizing the relative importance of highly intertwined factors in human development.

Indexed as

AgingIntelligenceLongevityAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPlay and PlaythingsYoung Adultagingchessexpertiseintelligencepractice

Identifiers

PMID31451633
PMCPMC6744885
OpenAlexW2970385865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.