Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451605›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Content Tuning in the Medial Temporal Lobe Cortex: Voxels that Perceive, Retrieve.

Heidrun Schultz, Roni Tibon, Karen F LaRocque, Stephanie A Gagnon, Anthony D Wagner, Bernhard P Staresina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adding Meaning to Memories: How Parietal Cortex Combines Semantic Content with Episodic Experience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heidrun SchultzSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom h.schultz@bham.ac.uk.
Roni TibonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-6715
Karen F LaRocqueDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-2130 CA.
Stephanie A GagnonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-2130 CA.
Anthony D WagnerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, 94305-2130 CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-4543
Bernhard P StaresinaSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do we recall vivid details from our past based only on sparse cues? Research suggests that the phenomenological reinstatement of past experiences is accompanied by neural reinstatement of the original percept. This process critically depends on the medial temporal lobe (MTL). Within the MTL, perirhinal cortex (PRC) and parahippocampal cortex (PHC) are thought to support encoding and recall of objects and scenes, respectively, with the hippocampus (HC) serving as a content-independent hub. If the fidelity of recall indeed arises from neural reinstatement of perceptual activity, then successful recall should preferentially draw upon those neural populations within content-sensitive MTL cortex that are tuned to the same content during perception. We tested this hypothesis by having eighteen human participants undergo functional MRI (fMRI) while they encoded and recalled objects and scenes paired with words. Critically, recall was cued with the words only. While HC distinguished successful from unsuccessful recall of both objects and scenes, PRC and PHC were preferentially engaged during successful versus unsuccessful object and scene recall, respectively. Importantly, within PRC and PHC, this content-sensitive recall was predicted by content tuning during perception: Across PRC voxels, we observed a positive relationship between object tuning during perception and successful object recall, while across PHC voxels, we observed a positive relationship between scene tuning during perception and successful scene recall. Our results thus highlight content-based roles of MTL cortical regions for episodic memory and reveal a direct mapping between content-specific tuning during perception and successful recall.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallPerirhinal CortexPhotic StimulationRandom AllocationTemporal LobeYoung Adultepisodic memoryfMRIhippocampusmedial temporal lobeparahippocampal cortexperirhinal cortex

Identifiers

PMID31451605
PMCPMC6751376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.