Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31451524›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2019

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against herpes zoster in Canada: a modelling study.

Mélanie Drolet, Zhou Zhou, Chantal Sauvageau, Philippe DeWals, Vladimir Gilca, Rachid Amini, Élodie Bénard, Marc Brisson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mélanie DroletCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Zhou ZhouCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Chantal SauvageauCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Philippe DeWalsCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Vladimir GilcaCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Rachid AminiCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Élodie BénardCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que.
Marc BrissonCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que. Marc.Brisson@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Université Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo vaccines against herpes zoster are currently authorized for use in Canada: the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine and live attenuated zoster vaccine. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these 2 vaccines.

methodsWe used a decision analytic static cohort model parametrized with Canadian epidemiologic and economic data. We performed the economic analysis from the health care system perspective, using a lifetime horizon and a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, relative to no vaccination. We ran 30 000 simulations varying all model parameters, including vaccine costs, efficacy and waning.

resultsThe number needed to vaccinate (NNV) was higher for the live attenuated zoster vaccine than for the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine for all herpes zoster-related events at all ages. For example, in persons exactly 65 years old, for herpes zoster, median NNV was 21 (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 13-31) versus 8 (90% UI 6-18), and for postherpetic neuralgia, NNV was 64 (90% UI 33-93) versus 31 (90% UI 23-73). For the recombinant vaccine, the median cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $25 881 per QALY gained for adults aged 50 years or older. For the live vaccine, the cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $130 587 per QALY gained and were less than $45 000 per QALY gained only for those 65 to 75 years old. Given its higher efficacy, we estimated that the cost for the complete series of the recombinant vaccine could be $150 to $200 more than the cost of the live vaccine and still be considered cost-effective.

interpretationOur model predicted that the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine is likely cost-effective in Canada for adults 60 years or older, and is likely more cost-effective than live attenuated zoster vaccine. These results have informed updated national and provincial recommendations on herpes zoster vaccination.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAgedCanadaDecision Support TechniquesHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansMass VaccinationMiddle AgedNeuralgia, PostherpeticQuality-Adjusted Life YearsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID31451524
PMCPMC6710082
OpenAlexW2969286496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.