Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450952›Full record

ArticleChronic respiratory disease

The lay health worker-patient relationship in promoting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in COPD: What makes it work?

Gill Gilworth, Simon Lewin, Alison J Wright, Stephanie Jc Taylor, Rachel Tuffnell, Lauren Hogg, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Sally J Singh, Patrick White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gill Gilworth1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1408-8878
Simon Lewin2 Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Alison J Wright4 Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Stephanie Jc Taylor5 Bart's and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Rachel Tuffnell6 The Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Integrated Respiratory Team, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lauren Hogg7 Physiotherapy Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas S Hopkinson8 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sally J Singh9 Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Patrick White1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0213-30052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lay health workers (LHWs) can improve access to services and adherence to treatment, as well as promoting self-care and prevention. Their effect in promoting uptake and adherence in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been tested. PR is the most effective treatment for the symptoms and disability of COPD, but this effectiveness is undermined by poor rates of completion. Trained LHWs with COPD, who also have first-hand experience of PR, are well placed to help overcome the documented barriers to its completion. The relationship between LHWs and patients may be one of the keys to their effectiveness but it has been little explored. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were used with the aim of examining the LHW-patient partnership in a feasibility study of trained PR-experienced LHWs used to support COPD patients referred to PR. Twelve volunteers with COPD who completed LHW training supported 66 patients referred for PR. All 12 of these LHWs gave end-of-study interviews, 21 COPD patients supported by LHWs were also interviewed. Patients reported that the LHWs were keen to share their experiences of PR, and that this had a positive impact. The enthusiasm of the LHWs for PR was striking. The common bond between LHWs and patients of having COPD together with the LHWs positive, first-hand experience of PR were dominant and recurring themes in their relationship.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInterpersonal RelationsPatient ComplianceVolunteersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPeer GroupPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchCOPDLay health workerspatient navigatorspulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31450952
PMCPMC6710699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.